Search

How can we help?

Icon

£40,000 in penalties for failure to inform and consult

The Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in Verizon European Works Council v Verizon Group highlights the risk of bypassing established statutory mechanisms for informing and consulting with the workforce. Where these arrangements are national works councils or European Works Councils (EWCs), this can lead to penalties of up to £75,000.

Under the arrangements in place at Verizon, the employer had to inform and consult with the EWC in advance of redundancy decisions being made. However, instead of doing this, on 21 December 2018 Verizon invited the EWC select committee to a meeting it described as confidential. At the meeting, the employer informed the EWC members them that it intended to make 216 redundancies in eight European countries (out of a total European workforce of 5,599) and that the redundancy process would start two weeks later.

Although the EWC select committee raised an internal complaint, the employer went ahead regardless. The parties attempted arbitration but the arbitrators did not come to any conclusions. The EWC made a complaint to the Central Arbitration Committee, which was upheld.

The EAT has now imposed a £35,000 penalty on Verizon for failure to inform and consult. It decided that:

  • The proposed reorganisation must have been in the employer’s mind well before 21 December 2018.
  • The employer had supplied the required information to the appropriate members of the EWC too late for a proper consultation before a final decision was made.
  • The employer had made a final decision without giving the EWC proper opportunity to have any meaningful input

Where these arrangements are national works councils or European Works Councils (EWCs), this can lead to penalties of up to £75,000.

The EAT also issued a £5,000 penalty for Verizon’s refusal to pay the reasonable expenses relating to the negotiations that were necessary to enable the EWC to carry out its functions appropriately.

In any proposed restructure or redundancy, it is always vital to be aware of obligations to inform and consult before the decision to go ahead has been taken. For advice on this and related matters, contact our specialist team.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 26 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 23 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Section 172 Companies Act 2006: Key lessons from Saxon Woods v Costa

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa UKSC 21 clarifies directors’ duties under Section 172 Companies Act 2006, confirming that good faith requires both honest belief and appropriate conduct.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.