Search

How can we help?

Icon

New ruling provides health and safety detriment

Protection from health and safety detriments and the right to PPE should cover ‘workers’ as well as employees, High Court rules.

Until coronavirus arrived in the UK places like offices, shops, care homes,  hospitality venues and other peoples’ own homes were rarely considered to be potentially dangerous places to work.  That’s why so few businesses had any awareness or experience of their employees’ rights under S44 and S100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In brief, S44 and S100 protect employees from being subjected to a detriment, or being dismissed if they leave work, refuse to attend work, or take some action, because they reasonably believe there is a threat of ‘serious and imminent danger’.  It often comes as a surprise to employers that it is the employee’s belief that counts, depending on the  information available to them at the time, and not the employer’s opinion.

Protection from health and safety detriments and the right to PPE should cover ‘workers’ as well as employees, High Court rules.

The right not to subjected to H&S detriments, and the right to be provided with PPE where an activity at work cannot be avoided, derive from European Directives (The Framework Directive and The Personal Protective Equipment Directive).  However, in UK law these rights only apply to employees, not workers. In its application for a judicial review, the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWUGB) argued that the government had failed to implement these European H&S Directives and that workers should be given the same protection as employees. Last week the High Court agreed with the IWUGB [The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain v The Secretary of State for Work & Pensions and others]

With so many workers in the gig economy operating in public facing roles, from care workers to taxi and deliver drivers, this case significantly expands the number of people afforded H&S protection, and the right to bring claims against their employers. If businesses had an urgent need to understand these key H&S rights when COVID 19 first afflicted the UK last Spring, that need is even greater now.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 10 July 2024
  • Employment

Redundancy : Back to Basics FAQs

Redundancy can be a scary and overwhelming time both for employees being made redundant, and for those that have to make the decision. It is important for both parties to know their rights and obligations in this time.

art
  • 09 July 2024
  • Public Procurement

Buyer Beware: Practical Guidance for Breach of Warranty in an SPA

Are you buying a business? Whether you are buying shares in a company or purchasing its assets… the general Latin common law principle “caveat emptor” applies.

art
  • 08 July 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

Navigating corporate transparency: ECCTA reforms series

This is the second article in a series exploring the changes brought by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA).

art
  • 08 July 2024
  • Immigration

Right to Work Check Guidance – Key Changes for Employers

This updated guidance introduces several significant changes aimed at streamlining the right to work verification process for employers.

Pub
  • 02 July 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data protection unlocked for HR: Introduction to data protection

Lucy Densham Brown and Sana Nahas from the data protection team will discuss data protection issues encountered by HR professionals in the first episode of the ‘Data Protection Unlocked for HR’ podcast series.

Pub
  • 27 June 2024
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: What Transfers

In this sixth podcast in our TUPE Podcast Series, Amanda Glover will delve into the automatic transfer principle and what transfers to the incoming employer under TUPE.