Search

How can we help?

Icon

Making flexible working the default

The Government has recently announced a consultation on flexible working, the Making flexible working the default consultation takes place from the Governments Good Work Plan: Proposals to support families which was published in July 2019.

The Government is looking for views on whether:

  • Flexible working should be a day 1 right
  • There should be amendments to the eight business reasons for rejecting a flexible working request
  • Employers should explore alternatives to the employees flexible working request
  • The rigid administrative requirements in making a flexible working request should be amended
  • Employees should be made aware of their right to make a temporary flexible working

The Good Work Plan was published before Covid-19 hit, however, the Making flexible working the default consultation has placed an emphasis on Covid-19 and one of the aims of the consultation is to ensure the labour market is primed for a post Covid-19 world.

Indeed, the Consultation highlights how we have had to adapt during Covid-19 and that not all flexible working practices are suitable in the long term. However, the pandemic has “opened our eyes to what may be possible, and we now have the chance to seize the moment and make flexible working – in all its forms – part of business DNA”. It is no surprise that the Government wants to use this moment to ensure flexible working, in some form, continues post Covid 19.

Research Published by Sage on behalf of the Tavistock Institute shows that employees who have flexible working have higher job satisfaction and increased dedication compared to those who don’t. Access the full consultation Making flexible working the default

One of the aims of the consultation is to ensure the labour market is primed for a post Covid-19 world.

Prior to Covid-19 a study published in September 2019 by GQR for TUC showed that less than half of the workforce were offered flexible working. Covid-19 obviously changed the way we work and employers who do not offer some sort of flexible working will be seen as out of touch and will likely lose talent.

Employees who have had flexible working request rejected in the past may make them again and if they had flexible working during the pandemic will use that as an example to show how it will work. Employers will have to think carefully on the grounds of any rejections.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.