Search

How can we help?

Icon

Major changes to Job Support Scheme: could it now work for your business?

The Chancellor has today announced welcome major changes to the Job Support Scheme (JSS). The changes mean the scheme is likely to be worth considering for many more employers.

For businesses in all areas of the UK that are still permitted to open but are impacted by coronavirus (COVID-19):

  • Employees will only have to work a minimum of 20% of normal hours (down from the former 33% minimum) which are fully paid for by employers.
  • Employers will only have to pay 5% of wages for hours not worked (reduced from 33%).
  • The government will provide up to 61.67% of wages for hours not worked (increased from 33%), capped at £1541.75 per month (increased from £697.92 under the previous rules).

The employer still has to pay employer NICs and auto enrolment contributions on the total amount.

This means that an employee who works 20% of their normal hours (and whose normal salary is under £3,125 per month) will receive at least 73% of their pay.

Example: an employee who normally earns £250 per week.

  • Under the Jobs Support Scheme, they work 20% of their normal hours.
  • They earn £50 from the employer for the hours worked.
  • They employer contributes £10 for the unworked hours.
  • The government contributes £124 for the unworked hours.
  • They receive £184 per week in total, which is 73% of full pay a month.

This means that an employee who works 20% of their normal hours (and whose normal salary is under £3,125 per month) will receive at least 73% of their pay.

There is no change to JSS where businesses are legally forced to close due to coronavirus (COVID-19) restrictions:

  • The Government will pay 67% of employees’ wages up to £2100 per month.
  • Employers pay nothing towards wages (but have to pay employer NICs and auto enrolment contributions).

For advice on what these changes could mean for your business, please contact our Employment team.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

UK Directors’ Responsibilities

On becoming a director of a company, directors undertake to comply with various duties and responsibilities. which are specified in the Companies Act 2006. In this article, we will explain how you can comply with these practical responsibilities.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Commercial Real Estate

What happens to a sublease when the headlease is surrendered, forfeited or disclaimed?

The intermediate tenant under the headlease falls away and the tenant under the sublease becomes the direct tenant of the superior landlord.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Employment

Mistletoe and Missteps: Preventing Harassment at Christmas Parties

As the festive season approaches, offices are coming together for their annual Christmas parties, offering a chance to unwind and celebrate the year’s achievements. However, whilst these events provide a necessary release and recognition of employee’s contributions, they also present a heightened risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly sexual harassment.

art
  • 03 December 2024
  • Immigration

UPDATE – Ministers to postpone full eVisa rollout amid fears of UK residents being stranded abroad

The UK government will postpone the full transition to eVisas, initially planned for 1 January 2025, following concerns that system glitches could leave UK residents stranded abroad.

art
  • 02 December 2024
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Era of AI

In this recent case, the First-Tier Tribunal gave a stark warning to litigants about use of AI in litigation.

art
  • 28 November 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill: The Regulatory Policy Committee opinion

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.