- 22 July 2016
In the recent case of Royal Mail Group Limited v Jhuti, the Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that an employee had been automatically unfairly dismissed even though the manager responsible for the decision had been unaware of her protected disclosures.
After only 4 weeks of employment, Ms Jhuti became suspicious that her colleague had breached Royal Mail’s policies and Ofcom requirements. She informed the team leader and was advised to admit she had been mistaken and to retract her allegations. Fearing for her job, she did just that. She was subsequently given an “ever changing unattainable list of requirements” and was put on a performance management plan. Ms Jhuti complained to HR that she was being harassed and bullied as a result of her disclosures, but this was not dealt with properly.
A different manager was then appointed to review Ms Jhuti’s performance. She was not given copies of Ms Jhuti’s emails containing the disclosures but became aware that she had been upset about something. When asked, the team leader told the manager that Ms Jhuti had complained about improper conduct at Royal Mail but had subsequently retracted her allegations. The manager did not meet with Ms Jhuti (as she was unwell) and took the information from the team leader at face value. Ms Jhuti was dismissed for poor performance.
The Employment Tribunal found that Ms Jhuti had made protected disclosures and had been subjected to detriments. However, it decided that she had not been automatically unfairly dismissed because the decision was not based on someone else’s motivation. The manager had been unaware of Ms Jhuti’s disclosures and genuinely believed she was a poor performer. On appeal however, the EAT took a different approach, noting that the team leader had intentionally misled the manager about Ms Jhuti’s disclosures. The EAT considered it was imperative that the team leader’s reason and motivation should be taken into account and concluded that it was inevitable that Royal Mail would be found to have dismissed Ms Jhuti because she had made protected disclosures.
Chambers and Partners
The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.
It remains to be seen whether an employer would be held liable if the manipulation is done by someone in a non-managerial position who is not responsible for the employee.
For further information or support with unfair dismissal or protected disclosures, please contact our specialist employment lawyers on firstname.lastname@example.org
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
About this article
SubjectLack of knowledge of employee’s protected disclosures did not prevent a finding of automatic unfair dismissal
Published22 July 2016
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 22 September 2023
Talking Employment Law: New family friendly rights
In this first podcast in the ‘Talking Employment Law’ series, Lucy Densham Brown and Rebecca Dowle, members of the employment team summarise some of the big new family-friendly Bills that are working their way through parliament.
- 20 September 2023
- Commercial Real Estate
Commercial buyers beware of residential Stamp Duty Land Tax
This article discusses a recent case in which a property buyer calculated the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on the purchase at a lower rate, due to the mixed-use purpose of the property.
- 19 September 2023
- Privacy and Data Protection
Organisations’ use of social media: Data protection
Social media applications (or commonly known as ‘apps’) are being developed all the time and we are constantly being introduced to new social media platforms, some of which take almost no time to gain huge popularity.
- 14 September 2023
Entrepreneurial Dreams: What is the Innovator Founder Visa?
In an era defined by innovation and entrepreneurship, the United Kingdom has made a substantial effort towards fostering its reputation as a global hub for start-ups and innovators. The introduction of the UK’s ‘Innovator Founder’ route has marked a pivotal moment in the country’s immigration policy.
- 11 September 2023
- Corporate and M&A
Changes to the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts
The government published a consultation on 18 July 2023 seeking the public’s views on its proposals to reform the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts and Employee Benefit Trusts. Parties are invited to express their opinions via email via the government website until the consultation closes on 25 September 2023.