Search

How can we help?

Icon

IR35 changes: HMRC ups its game

As businesses continue to prepare for the impact of the April 2020 changes to IR35 and the private sector, it is important to be aware that this week the government has launched an update to its online check employment status for tax (CEST) tool.

Work can only be employment for tax purposes if:

  • the individual effectively has to carry out the work personally;
  • there is an obligation on the individual to do the agreed work and on the end-user to pay for it; and
  • the end-user has significant control over the work to be done and how, when and where it is done.

As well as only producing an answer in 85% of cases, previous iterations of CEST had been rightly criticised for not taking enough consideration of control in determining whether tax and NI is payable.

The latest version is much less crude and deals with control in much more detail. Of course, CEST is still not infallible.

This week the government has launched an update to its online check employment status for tax (CEST) tool.

In order to be well prepared for the April 2020 changes and avoid the very expensive consequences of getting this wrong, it is crucial that businesses review their use of contractors by:

  • carrying out an audit to understand how the working relationship operates in practice rather than only relying on the written contracts, which will invariably state that the individual is self-employed.
  • only inputting accurate information into status checking tools such as CEST.
  • ensuring right to work checks are carried out if there is a possibility that the individual is employed for tax purposes. Businesses that fail to do so and are found to have employed an illegal worker face heavy sanctions.

For more information on how to get ready for the imminent IR35 changes, including specific advice where you believe that the status checking tool has not given the correct answer, contact our employment team.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.