Search

How can we help?

Icon

Increase to damages bands for injury to feelings and psychiatric injury

The Presidents of the Employment Tribunal in England, Wales and Scotland have released a joint response to the Vento Bands Consultation (named after the case Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police in which these bands were originally set out). These bands apply to discrimination cases, as well as other specific types of claim such as whistleblowing.

The new bands take account of inflation, as well as the 10% uplift to psychiatric injury or injury to feelings awards (ordered by the Court of Appeal in Da Souza v Vinci Construction).

The new bands are as follows:

  • Lower Band – Less serious cases: £800-£8,400
  • Middle Band – Cases which do not merit an award in the upper band: £8,400-£25,200
  • Upper Band – Most Serious Cases: £25,200-£42,000
  • Exceptional Cases – £42,000+

The new bands take account of inflation, as well as the 10% uplift to psychiatric injury or injury to feelings awards (ordered by the Court of Appeal in Da Souza v Vinci Construction).

This new guidance will take effect from 11 September 2017 and will apply to claims presented to an employment tribunal on or after that date. For claims before this date, tribunals will have the option of adjusting the bands to reflect inflation and the Presidential Guidance will set out the methodology for doing so.

The Guidance will be reviewed and if necessary, amended to take account of inflation again in March 2018 and annually thereafter, with the new bands taking effect on the following 6th April, if applicable.

Please speak to a member of our employment team if you require further information.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 19 May 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Thinking of exiting your business? Part 2

In the second instalment of our three-part series, join Stuart Mullins from Clarkslegal and Nicky Goringe Larkin from Succession Planning as they discuss the complexities surrounding business financing, accounting practices, and valuation strategies, along with key insights into private equity.

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

London Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our London office on Tuesday 24th June, hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner; Katie Glendinning, Partner; and Amanda Glover, Associate, as they unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

Reading Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our Reading office Tuesday 17th June hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner, Katie Glendinning, Partner and Amanda Glover, Associate, will unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

art
  • 15 May 2025
  • Immigration

The 2025 Immigration White Paper: A Turning Point in UK Immigration Policy

On 12 May 2025, the UK Government unveiled its White Paper titled “Restoring Control Over the Immigration System”, outlining the most substantial proposed changes to immigration law since the post-Brexit overhaul.

Pub
  • 15 May 2025
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series – Information and Consultation Obligations

In this ninth episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Katie Glendinning, a Partner in the employment team, will examine the information and consultation obligations under TUPE.

art
  • 15 May 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Ashley v HMRC – The High Court clarifies the scope of Data Subject Access Requests

DSARs are very rarely the subject of litigation, and they are even rarer in the High Court, so the case of Ashley v HMRC is a valuable decision for both data subjects and data controllers.