Search

How can we help?

Icon

Is your local pub under threat? How can you save it?

The Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011) contains several proposals to give local authorities new freedoms and flexibility in order to protect local services and drive growth. The general power gives councils more freedom to work together with others in new ways to drive down costs. It gives them increased confidence to do creative, innovative things to meet local people’s needs.

One of the key policy goals of the LA 2011 was to give communities more power to become involved in the way local services are delivered by stimulating social, environmental and economic growth and regeneration through community asset ownership. This was intended to counter the damage that can be done to communities and community services when buildings or other amenities are closed or sold.

One of the powers included within the act is the right to bid for assets of community value. It allows communities to apply to their local council to have a building listed as an ‘asset of community value’. The council can approve the listing if it considers the building’s current use (or use in the recent past with a prospect of being revived) ‘furthers the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community’ and is likely to continue to do so. For instance, where pub landlords may want to sell off pubs to developers if the Local Authority lists the pub as an asset of community value, then it can only be used as a pub.

LA 2011 requires local authorities to maintain a list of assets of community. When listed assets come up for sale or change of ownership, the Act then gives community groups the time to develop a bid and raise the money to bid to buy the asset when it comes on the open market. This will help local communities keep much-loved sites in public use and part of local life. Where land is included in a local authority’s list of assets of community value, it remains on that list for five years whether the community bids for it or not.

We can see that the LA 2011 has helped save pubs in the past. Grade II listed The Ivy House in Nunhead had been classified as an ‘asset of community value’ by Southwark Council which protects it from change of use and halts any pending sale until community groups have had the chance to buy the property The community needed to raise the £810,000 asking price for the pub, which is where the Architectural Heritage Fund (AHF) who is a registered charity, working since 1976 to promote the conservation and sustainable re-use of historic buildings for the benefit of communities across the UK, stepped in to lend £550,000 towards both acquisition and for working capital purposes

Following completion of the purchase on 15 March 2013, Ivy House Community Pub Limited launched a community share issue to enable people and businesses to invest directly in the pub to secure its long-term future as London’s first co-operative pub and community hub. Over £140,000 was raised in this way, and the business successfully opened to the public in August 2013.

One of the key policy goals of the LA 2011 was to give communities more power to become involved in the way local services are delivered by stimulating social, environmental and economic growth and regeneration through community asset ownership.

Ten years on from the introduction of the LA 2011 we can see that the purpose of the act has not been fulfilled in its entirety. Although it has helped some local businesses remain in the community with either financial assistance through the reduction of business (another power given in the LA 2011 to Councils) or the protection of their use we are still seeing many community group deciding not to take ownership of pubs and them ending up sitting empty until the developers get their way.

Clarkslegal works closely with the pub sector so please do get in touch if this article raises any queries or questions and we will be happy to help.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 26 March 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

AI Podcast: AI and Data Security

In the third and final podcast in our ‘AI Podcast’ trilogy, members of the data protection team, will be discussing how to use AI to process data safely. They will be looking closely at the risks for businesses and the types of data security protections you can put in place.

art
  • 26 March 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Key considerations for data retention policies

In the ever-evolving landscape of data protection regulations, data retention stands as a crucial aspect of compliance and risk management for organisations across industries.

art
  • 21 March 2024
  • Immigration

What is a right to work share code?

A right to work share code is a unique 9-character alphanumeric code generated via the UK Government website. This initiative has been implemented by the UK Government to verify an individual’s right to work online.

Pub
  • 21 March 2024
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Who Transfers?

In this fifth podcast in our TUPE Podcast Series, Amanda Glover will be focusing on ‘who transfers’ under TUPE. Looking at the definition of ‘employee’ under TUPE legislation and the tests that apply in deciding if those employees transfer.

art
  • 20 March 2024
  • Employment

Changes to Employment Laws from April 2024 – are you ready?

There’s a large number of employment law changes coming in April which are set to shake up the workplace. It’s crucial for employers to stay informed and prepared.

art
  • 19 March 2024
  • Employment

Instant Messaging in the Workplace: Factors to be aware of

Workplaces have changed beyond recognition in the four years since the first COVID-19 lockdowns. This anniversary represents an opportunity to look back at how workplaces have changed in that period, from the increased use of flexible and hybrid working, to the continuing and significant integration of more technology in office-based work.