Search

How can we help?

Icon

Is your local pub under threat? How can you save it?

The Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011) contains several proposals to give local authorities new freedoms and flexibility in order to protect local services and drive growth. The general power gives councils more freedom to work together with others in new ways to drive down costs. It gives them increased confidence to do creative, innovative things to meet local people’s needs.

One of the key policy goals of the LA 2011 was to give communities more power to become involved in the way local services are delivered by stimulating social, environmental and economic growth and regeneration through community asset ownership. This was intended to counter the damage that can be done to communities and community services when buildings or other amenities are closed or sold.

One of the powers included within the act is the right to bid for assets of community value. It allows communities to apply to their local council to have a building listed as an ‘asset of community value’. The council can approve the listing if it considers the building’s current use (or use in the recent past with a prospect of being revived) ‘furthers the social wellbeing or social interests of the local community’ and is likely to continue to do so. For instance, where pub landlords may want to sell off pubs to developers if the Local Authority lists the pub as an asset of community value, then it can only be used as a pub.

LA 2011 requires local authorities to maintain a list of assets of community. When listed assets come up for sale or change of ownership, the Act then gives community groups the time to develop a bid and raise the money to bid to buy the asset when it comes on the open market. This will help local communities keep much-loved sites in public use and part of local life. Where land is included in a local authority’s list of assets of community value, it remains on that list for five years whether the community bids for it or not.

We can see that the LA 2011 has helped save pubs in the past. Grade II listed The Ivy House in Nunhead had been classified as an ‘asset of community value’ by Southwark Council which protects it from change of use and halts any pending sale until community groups have had the chance to buy the property The community needed to raise the £810,000 asking price for the pub, which is where the Architectural Heritage Fund (AHF) who is a registered charity, working since 1976 to promote the conservation and sustainable re-use of historic buildings for the benefit of communities across the UK, stepped in to lend £550,000 towards both acquisition and for working capital purposes

Following completion of the purchase on 15 March 2013, Ivy House Community Pub Limited launched a community share issue to enable people and businesses to invest directly in the pub to secure its long-term future as London’s first co-operative pub and community hub. Over £140,000 was raised in this way, and the business successfully opened to the public in August 2013.

One of the key policy goals of the LA 2011 was to give communities more power to become involved in the way local services are delivered by stimulating social, environmental and economic growth and regeneration through community asset ownership.

Ten years on from the introduction of the LA 2011 we can see that the purpose of the act has not been fulfilled in its entirety. Although it has helped some local businesses remain in the community with either financial assistance through the reduction of business (another power given in the LA 2011 to Councils) or the protection of their use we are still seeing many community group deciding not to take ownership of pubs and them ending up sitting empty until the developers get their way.

Clarkslegal works closely with the pub sector so please do get in touch if this article raises any queries or questions and we will be happy to help.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.