Search

How can we help?

Icon

Employers no longer have to pay National Insurance contributions for apprentices under the age of 25

April 2016 marks a change in the law that is designed to further encourage employers to take on more apprentices. Since 6 April 2016 employers no longer have to pay National Insurance contributions for apprentices under the age of 25 for earnings below £827 per week (£43,000 per year).  It is thought that employers of young apprentices are set to save thousands of pounds in National Insurance contributions as a result of the recent change, and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills estimates that employers will now save around £1000 a year when employing an apprentice aged under 25 and earning £16,000 per annum.

This is just one of many steps that the Government has taken or is expected to take in attempts to encourage more employers to offer more apprenticeships. By April 2017 the Government intends  to establish the Institute of Apprenticeships; a new independent body led by employers that will ensure the quality of apprenticeships in England. In addition, the Government has also introduced a £10million fund for the purposes of boosting the number of degree apprenticeships available.

The Government has also introduced a £10million fund for the purposes of boosting the number of degree apprenticeships available.

As part of this agenda, the Government has also recently published draft legislation introducing the Apprentice Levy from April 2017, which will be a 0.5% charge on employers’ pay bills in excess of £3m per tax year, which has the stated aim of raising £3bn to fund new apprenticeships and training schemes across the UK.

Apprenticeships are a growing priority of the current Government and are expected to become a more frequent feature in employers’ organisations in the coming years.  If you are thinking of employing apprentices, one of our experienced employment lawyers will be more than happy to discuss this with you and the issues in employing young people generally.

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.