Search

How can we help?

Icon

Clarkslegal act for Granahan McCourt Capital on acquisition of Strategic Imperatives

Clarkslegal’s corporate team, led by Ashan Arif and Jacob Montague, has advised Granaham McCourt Capital on its multi-million-pound acquisition of Strategic Imperatives.

Granaham McCourt Capital is a global leader in technology, media and telecommunications, committed to delivering world-leading infrastructure.  Strategic Imperatives is a future-focussed provided of cloud-based monetisation, billing and provisioning solutions that create and support commercial opportunities for the telecoms industry.

Partner at GMC, Santiago Corredoira-Jack said: “Clarkslegal acted for GMC as our legal advisor in a complex M&A international transaction.  Specifically, Clarkslegal executed the legal due diligence and led the legal drafting and negotiation of all contracts required in a complex corporate deal due to tax and deal structuring reasons. We would recommend Clarks as a leading corporate legal advisor in UK M&A due to their ability to work under a closed budget while keeping the highest professional standards and delivering a top professional advise under total availability, impressive technical-legal know-how and capacity to focus on the key matters at stake.”

We would recommend Clarks as a leading corporate legal advisor in UK M&A due to their ability to work under a closed budget while keeping the highest professional standards and delivering a top professional advise under total availability, impressive technical-legal know-how and capacity to focus on the key matters at stake.”

Ashan Arif commented: “It was an excellent transaction to be part of – a real challenging tax driven deal structure to get to grips with and negotiate, and we are delighted to have successful completed this to the satisfaction of everyone involved.  We very much look forward to building on our relationship with GMC”.

Clarkslegal corporate team specialise in advising on mergers and acquisitions.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 03 February 2025
  • Employment

Indirect discrimination: How mandated office returns could discriminate against working mothers

In this article though, we will focus on one of the biggest potential hurdles, and the one that is garnering the most media attention and the most criticism. Is a return to work policy discriminatory on grounds of sex?

art
  • 20 January 2025
  • Employment

AI Opportunities Action Plan – The impact of AI on employment

The Government has announced its ‘AI Opportunities Action Plan’ in which it plans to increase the use of AI across the UK to ensure the UK is a world leader in the field. 

art
  • 14 January 2025
  • Employment

Is this the end of working from home?

In this article, we explore what legal rights employees and businesses have in this context as well as considering more commercial factors.

art
  • 08 January 2025
  • Employment

Round-up of employment law changes in 2024 and what to look out for in 2025

In this article, we will take a whistlestop tour of the various key employment law and case law changes that have taken place this year and then we will highlight what to expect in 2025.

Pub
  • 06 January 2025
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Unfair Dismissal and TUPE

In this eighth episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Katie Glendinning, a Partner in the employment team, focuses on dismissals in a TUPE context and, in particular, the additional protection afforded by TUPE.

art
  • 03 January 2025
  • Employment

Fire and Rehire – Change to compensation rules from 20 January 2025

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.