Search

How can we help?

Icon

Bribery Act 2010 bites…….

It was widely reported, earlier this month, that a Scottish company, Braid Logistics (UK) Limited, had agreed to pay some £2.2m to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service’s civil recovery unit by way of an agreed civil settlement, having accepted that it had obtained business through unlawful conduct.

What is very salutary in this case is that the company had apparently “discovered potentially dishonest activities” connected to two contracts in 2012, carried out an investigation which found that certain employees, without authorisation, had paid bribes in relation to those contracts in breach of the Act, dismissed those involved and voluntarily self-reported the case to the Crown Office.

And yet, despite what appears to be an exemplary response, the company had to pay a very significant sum to the authorities.

The issue here, and what led to this payment, is that the company accepted (and for many other companies, this may well be a case of “There but for the grace of God…”) that it had failed in its responsibility to prevent the bribery happening, thereby accepting responsibility for a contravention of Section 7 of the Act. Under this section, a company is guilty of an offence if a person associated with it (which can be an employee, agent or subsidiary) bribes (within the meaning of sections 1 and 6 of the Act) another person, intending to obtain or retain business or a business advantage for the company. There is a defence, but only if the company can show, on balance of probabilities, that it had in place adequate procedures designed to prevent bribery.

To be capable of being “adequate” on balance of probabilities, these procedures must be reviewed regularly, rigorously and at senior level to ensure that they continue to be fit for purpose, and changed and publicised if not. Given the potentially huge reputational and financial risks involved, compliance with the Act, which is still a relatively new obligation, cannot be done as a simple “tick the box” exercise and needs to be treated on the same footing, and with the same degree of attention, as, for example, the much more long-standing health and safety obligations which companies have.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

The company had to pay a very significant sum to the authorities

As an organisation grows, develops, moves into new jurisdictions, changes its ways of doing business and those it interacts with do likewise, it should adopt and apply a dynamic risk assessment approach to bribery, analogous to that used by emergency services which is “a continuous process of identifying hazards, assessing risk, taking action to eliminate or reduce risk, monitoring and reviewing, in the rapidly changing circumstances of an operational incident”.

Braid Logistics (UK) Limited’s group FD commented: “I would like to assure our customers that we now have emerged stronger from this incident with more robust processes and procedures in place throughout the group”. We wish them well, and hope that what has happened in their case will now help and encourage other companies to avoid similar action.

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 16 May 2024
  • Immigration

What Employers need to know about Biometric Residence Permits

Biometric Residence Permits (BRPs) are biometric immigration documents that are issued to non-EEA nationals and EEA nationals, who have been granted permission to stay in the UK.

art
  • 14 May 2024

Clarkslegal’s London team moves to new Chancery Lane office

The London office of Clarkslegal has relocated to Chancery House, on Chancery Lane. The staff is enthusiastic about the relocation because Chancery Lane has a longstanding association with the legal profession in London.

art
  • 10 May 2024
  • Employment

New duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment – coming October 2024

The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 is due to come into force in October 2024.

art
  • 09 May 2024
  • Employment

Labour Party Employment Law Proposals – Promises of further consultations and a softer approach

The Prime Minister recently announced a raft of changes, to be implemented in the next parliament, aimed at reducing the number of people who are economically inactive due to illness.

art
  • 09 May 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

Navigating corporate transparency: ECCTA reforms series – part 1

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) received Royal Assent in October 2023 and marked a pivotal moment in corporate governance and transparency.

art
  • 07 May 2024
  • Employment

Changes to TUPE rules from 1 July 2024

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (‘TUPE’) aim to safeguard employees’ rights on the transfer of a business or on the change of a service.