Search

How can we help?

Icon

Applicant X – avoiding bias and discrimination in recruitment

Most UK employers are well aware that the law protects job applicants from unlawful discrimination and bias – for example because of their sex, race or age. The majority of businesses have no intention of treating anyone unfairly and yet we continue to see stark imbalances within workforces. Why is this?

Attention has shifted in recent years from cases of outright prejudice, or what employment lawyers would call ‘direct discrimination’, to more subtle forms of bias that can influence a recruiter’s decision-making.

It’s now widely recognised that businesses and educational establishments have a part to play in reducing inequality by tackling forms of conscious and unconscious bias.

Last year professional services firm Deloitte announced they were looking to target the issue of social mobility by removing the name of an applicant’s school and university before interview. The aim – to help ensure that job offers are made on the basis of present potential, not past personal circumstance.

Over the next year a much wider-ranging trial will take place in universities, which should give a much better indication of the extent to which unconscious bias influences recruitment. With the support of the government, Exeter, Huddersfield, Liverpool and Winchester universities have volunteered to carry out “name-blind” admissions designed to counteract assumptions that may be made about a candidate’s race, gender or religion based on their name.

The majority of businesses have no intention of treating anyone unfairly and yet we continue to see stark imbalances within workforces. Why is this?

The outcome of the trial will be of interest to anyone involved in recruitment and selection, and it could even lead to legislative changes. In the meantime, employers may want to ‘equality test’ their own recruitment practices and procedures by withholding information that could lead to bias and discrimination. We regularly provide advice and training to business clients on these issues and we know from experience that it’s worth putting the work up front to avoid potentially damaging and costly discrimination claims from job applicants.

For further information or support with avoiding bias and discrimination in recruitment, please feel free to contact our specialist employment law team.

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 October 2026
  • Immigration

UK Immigration shake-up: More flexibility for skilled workers, but at what cost?

The UK Government has outlined further changes to its immigration system, with new measures affecting international graduates, sponsored workers, and businesses employing overseas talent.

art
  • 28 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Remote working: 5 key data protection risks for employers

Remote working has become more prominent in modern business. While flexible working arrangements can improve productivity and employee wellbeing, they also create new data protection risks. Regardless of the physical location in which work is done, compliance with UK GDPR does not change.

art
  • 27 October 2026
  • Employment

Fire and Rehire update: Key changes delayed

The Government has published two documents giving key updates to the anticipated changes around ‘fire and rehire’ and restricted contractual variations, coming about as a result of the Employment Rights Act 2025 (“ERA 2025”). We now understand that these changes will now be delayed to March, rather than January 2027.

art
  • 26 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 23 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Section 172 Companies Act 2006: Key lessons from Saxon Woods v Costa

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa UKSC 21 clarifies directors’ duties under Section 172 Companies Act 2006, confirming that good faith requires both honest belief and appropriate conduct.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.