Search

How can we help?

Icon

Applicant X – avoiding bias and discrimination in recruitment

Most UK employers are well aware that the law protects job applicants from unlawful discrimination and bias – for example because of their sex, race or age. The majority of businesses have no intention of treating anyone unfairly and yet we continue to see stark imbalances within workforces. Why is this?

Attention has shifted in recent years from cases of outright prejudice, or what employment lawyers would call ‘direct discrimination’, to more subtle forms of bias that can influence a recruiter’s decision-making.

It’s now widely recognised that businesses and educational establishments have a part to play in reducing inequality by tackling forms of conscious and unconscious bias.

Last year professional services firm Deloitte announced they were looking to target the issue of social mobility by removing the name of an applicant’s school and university before interview. The aim – to help ensure that job offers are made on the basis of present potential, not past personal circumstance.

Over the next year a much wider-ranging trial will take place in universities, which should give a much better indication of the extent to which unconscious bias influences recruitment. With the support of the government, Exeter, Huddersfield, Liverpool and Winchester universities have volunteered to carry out “name-blind” admissions designed to counteract assumptions that may be made about a candidate’s race, gender or religion based on their name.

The majority of businesses have no intention of treating anyone unfairly and yet we continue to see stark imbalances within workforces. Why is this?

The outcome of the trial will be of interest to anyone involved in recruitment and selection, and it could even lead to legislative changes. In the meantime, employers may want to ‘equality test’ their own recruitment practices and procedures by withholding information that could lead to bias and discrimination. We regularly provide advice and training to business clients on these issues and we know from experience that it’s worth putting the work up front to avoid potentially damaging and costly discrimination claims from job applicants.

For further information or support with avoiding bias and discrimination in recruitment, please feel free to contact our specialist employment law team.

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 15 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 overhaul: The end of Terms of Reference and future trends – Episode 3

In this final episode, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) discuss the impact of the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 overhaul, focusing on the end of Terms of Reference. Hear expert insights and practical tips for adapting to the new rules.

art
  • 15 July 2026
  • Employment

New guidance on interim relief: More applications, same high threshold

In certain limited unfair dismissal claims (such as those for automatic unfair dismissal relating to a protected disclosure) claimants can apply for interim relief. This is an emergency measure which essentially prevents a dismissal from taking effect until the claim has been heard.

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.