Search

How can we help?

Icon

Does abandoning a tender defeat a bidder’s claim?

Under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, bidders who are successful in establishing that a public body has breached its duties in the running of a regulated tender are entitled to recover damages. Other remedies may also be available, depending on whether a contract has been entered into or not by the public body.

But what if, after a challenge has been brought, the public body decides to abandon the tender? Does this defeat the bidder’s claim to damages?

This is the question the High Court recently had to consider in the case of Amey Highways Limited v West Sussex County Council. Amey had challenged the outcome of a highways contract which had been awarded to another bidder which scored just 0.03 more points than Amey. Amey contended that the Council had acted in breach of the Regulations in evaluating the tenders; and that had it not been for the Council’s breaches, it would have scored higher and should therefore have been awarded the contract.

After Amey’s claim had been issued, it successfully resisted an initial attempt by the Council to have the claim struck out. At that stage, concerned by the risks involved in continuing the litigation, the Council decided to abandon the procurement and re-tender the contract. Its expectation and intention was that abandoning the procurement would have the effect of bringing Amey’s claim for damages to an end.

However, the Court decided that the decision to abandon the tender did not have any effect on Amey’s claim. There was no suggestion that Amey would not have been awarded the contract, if they were correct in showing that they should have received higher marks. In addition, there was no evidence that the Council would have decided to abandon the procurement in any event, had it not been for the claim – the sole driver of the decision to abandon had been the hope that this would extinguish Amey’s claim.

Under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, bidders who are successful in establishing that a public body has breached its duties in the running of a regulated tender are entitled to recover damages.

The court decided that the Council’s decision to abandon, although it might have had the effect of depriving a bidder of a claim which had not come into existence until after the decision, did not have any impact on a cause of action which had already accrued before the date of the decision.

Public bodies will need to consider the impact of this decision carefully when deciding how to deal with procurement challenges, and be aware that abandoning a tender will not always be a get out of jail free card: a disgruntled bidder may still have the right to claim damages, even after a procurement has been abandoned and re-started.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 07 February 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Talk & Golf : Thinking of Exiting your Business?

Join Stuart Mullins, Partner at Clarkslegal, and Nicky Goringe Larkin, Managing Director at Succession Planning, for a morning breakfast talk on preparing your business for exit, followed by a round of golf at the Eyston Course at Caversham Golf Club.

art
  • 06 February 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Cookies and Consent: the ICO’s Cookie Review

In the digital age, cookies play a crucial role in how websites operate and interact with users.

art
  • 05 February 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Growing Pains for Businesses

This thought piece considers some of the key issues and pain points facing a business planning to scale up

art
  • 03 February 2025
  • Employment

Indirect discrimination: How mandated office returns could discriminate against working mothers

In this article though, we will focus on one of the biggest potential hurdles, and the one that is garnering the most media attention and the most criticism. Is a return to work policy discriminatory on grounds of sex?

art
  • 24 January 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

UK Data Protection: A look back at 2024 and what to expect in 2025

On 15 January 2025, Louise Keenan and Shauna Jones hosted our webinar “UK Data Protection: what happened in 2024 and what’s in store for 2025.” Our webinar is available for you to watch, but in this article, we will provide a brief summary of what was discussed.

art
  • 22 January 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Deal Announcement: Clarkslegal’s Corporate team advise founder on exit from Bristol based hospitality business

Clarkslegal is pleased to have advised the exiting shareholder and director of a hospitality business in the South West on the sale of their shareholding and termination of their employment.