Search

How can we help?

Icon

A guide on redundancy and settlement agreements

What is a redundancy?

It is a type of dismissal, and the statutory definition encompasses three types of situations: business closure, workplace closure, and reduction of workforce. Redundancy is a potentially fair reason for dismissal and therefore may give an employer a defence to an unfair dismissal claim.

 A redundancy dismissal is likely to be fair if:

  1. The employer identifies an appropriate pool for selection
  2. The individuals in the pool are consulted with
  3. An objective selection criterion is applied to those in the pool
  4. The employer considers suitable alternative employment where appropriate

A redundancy must be genuine. Employees selected for redundancy due to any of the protected characteristics in the Equalities Act 2010, or on grounds of fixed-term or part-time status, have the right to bring a claim for discrimination or for less favourable treatment due to their fixed-term or part-time status.

What rights does an employee have if they are made redundant?

Employees in a redundancy have the following rights:

  • A right to individual consultation
  • In a collective redundancy, all affected employees have the right to be informed and consulted in accordance with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
  • The option to move into a different position within the company if applicable
  • Employees with two years’ qualifying service have the right to time off to look for work or arrange training
  • The right to contractual notice, subject to statutory minimum notice
  • Employees with two years’ qualifying service have the right to receive a statutory redundancy payment. An employee may also be entitled to a contractual redundancy payment, if there is an express or implied right to one.

What is a settlement agreement?

This is an agreement between an employer and employee that sets out the terms of the employee’s termination of employment. It usually includes a waiver of the employee’s statutory and contractual claims on termination in return for some sort of (usually) monetary incentive. The agreement is legally binding and if a party is in breach, the persecuted party is free to bring a claim.

If an employee has a claim against their employer which could be brought in an employment tribunal, a settlement agreement may be used to stop the employee from making the claim or taking it any further.

What is a protected conversation

A protected conversation – sometimes referred to as pre-termination negotiation – is a conversation to discuss termination of employment and set out proposed terms of a settlement agreement.

What does without prejudice mean?

‘Without prejudice’ can be used as a heading or label or within the body of any letter, email or other document which forms part of an exchange of correspondence. It will prevent statements made in a genuine attempt to settle an existing or potential dispute from being used as evidence or admissions in court or tribunal proceedings against the party who made them. Parties are more likely to enter into settlement discussions if they can speak openly and without restriction.
It is common to see the words ‘without prejudice’ being used with the phrase ‘subject to contract’, which also confirms that nothing said during the negotiation process will give rise to a legally binding contract. All the terms must be agreed and signed by both parties first.

What are the differences between redundancy and settlement agreements?

Settlement agreements are sometimes offered in the context of a redundancy.

However, settlement agreements are voluntary. The employee does not have to sign the agreement and has room for negotiating the terms. Settlement agreements can also include larger sums of money than what the employee is entitled to in terms of a statutory redundancy payment, which make them more attractive to employees.
Settlement agreements may also be offered in circumstances other than redundancy, such as when an employer wants to dismiss the employee due to gross misconduct but does not want to deal with a potential claim for unfair dismissal.

An employer may offer a settlement agreement package that is more attractive to an employee than the redundancy package they are entitled to. If this is agreed, the employer can avoid the lengthy process of consultation, avoid future claims brought against them by the employee, and the terms are kept confidential from other employees.

If an employee rejects the settlement offer, the employer may still go through the redundancy procedure and the employee may take advice on whether it has been done fairly or whether they have any claims against the employer for unfair dismissal. This is why an employee will consider whether the amount being offered in the settlement agreement is adequate, because if they have any potential claims, they may be able to receive an amount of compensation greater than the settlement sums being offered.

How is a settlement agreement negotiated

If an employee suspects that this is not a genuine redundancy, they could let the employer know that they will be claiming unfair dismissal if the settlement payment is not increased. If the redundancy is genuine, however, the employee could simply ask the employer to be more generous. Some employees prefer to negotiate themselves, by trying to convince the employer to budge on certain aspects of the agreement, for example, increasing an ex-gratia payment.
The employee can alternatively negotiate through their solicitor, particularly where there are complex legal arguments to put forward. Obtaining independent legal advice is a requirement of a settlement agreement because the employee will be waiving their rights to bring or continue any claims against their employer. A solicitor would be advising the employee on the strengths of a potential case they may bring and explain on that basis which terms in the agreement are more easily negotiable. The solicitor would also advise on which terms are standard and may be difficult to convince the employer to change.

 

Melanie Pimenta

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4653

Settlement agreements may also be offered in circumstances other than redundancy, such as when an employer wants to dismiss the employee due to gross misconduct but does not want to deal with a potential claim for unfair dismissal.

Are payments in settlement agreements taxable?

Payment entitlements under the employment contract, such as salary, holiday pay, bonuses, and payment in lieu of notice are taxable.

The termination payment is not taxable up to £30,000. Any termination sums over and above £30,000 will be taxed and subjected to national insurance contributions (NICs). HMRC can recover unpaid tax and NICs, penalties and interest from the employer under the Income Tax (Pay as You Earn) Regulations 2003. The employer has the primary liability for this. If tax and NICs have not been properly accounted for, penalties for late payment and inaccurate returns could arise

Confidentiality clauses in a settlement agreement include?

A confidentiality requirement is very common in settlement agreements. It is a benefit for both the employer and employee.
The clause will likely restrict the employee informing others about the offer or any of its terms. There are standard exceptions that are usually included, allowing the employee to tell their spouse or partner, provided they keep the information confidential. The agreement should make it clear that the employee can still speak to the police or a regulator about a criminal issue or misconduct. The employee can also make a protected disclosure, commonly known as whistleblowing, under section 43A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In terms of informing a recruiter or prospective employer, the agreement usually allows this for the sake of confirming employment history. The terms of the agreement cannot be mentioned usually, however, the employee will likely be allowed to state that the reason their employment terminated was redundancy. An employee will also be allowed to speak to an insurer about income protection claims.

What are other standard terms found in settlement agreement?

Examples of standard terms:

  • The employer will pay the employee the outstanding balance for salary, bonuses, commission, and accumulated holiday (as well as additional termination payment)
  • A date on which the employment will end, and whether the employee will work during their notice period and do a handover
  • An explanation on what happens to current benefits, such as share schemes or health schemes, or the company car
  • An explanation on which payments have tax deductions and who bears the liability for further tax
  • The employer will likely fund the legal costs incurred by the employee in obtaining independent legal advice on the agreement (usually subject to a limit).
  • The employee will not make derogatory comments about their employer, whether that be in person or on social media

Time an employee should be given to consider a settlement agreement?

Acas has guidance on settlement agreements. It states that as a rule, a minimum of 10 calendar days should be allowed for an employee to consider the proposed formal written terms of a settlement agreement and to receive independent advice, unless the parties agree otherwise.

If you need advice about drafting or considering a settlement agreement, please contact our settlement agreement lawyers.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Melanie Pimenta

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4653

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Employment

Mistletoe and Missteps: Preventing Harassment at Christmas Parties

As the festive season approaches, offices are coming together for their annual Christmas parties, offering a chance to unwind and celebrate the year’s achievements. However, whilst these events provide a necessary release and recognition of employee’s contributions, they also present a heightened risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly sexual harassment.

art
  • 28 November 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill: The Regulatory Policy Committee opinion

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.

art
  • 19 November 2024
  • Employment

Booting out discrimination: Referee David Coote suspended over alleged derogatory comments

It has recently been reported that referee David Coote has been suspended with immediate effect, pending a full investigation, after making derogatory comments. In this article, we will focus on the alleged discriminatory comments made and learnings from this. Given that the matter is currently being investigated, it will be a big case to watch, as if the allegations are proven, what action could be taken against Mr Coote?

art
  • 13 November 2024
  • Employment

Modern Slavery Act 2015: Select Committee calls on the Government for change

The article will cover the House of Lords Modern Slavery Act 2015 Committee’s recent report and key recommendations following its inquiry into the impact and effectiveness of the Modern Slavery Act.

art
  • 12 November 2024
  • Employment

Redundancies on the Rise: What alternatives are available?

As we move into the second half of the year, and with the cost-of-living crisis not yet showing signs of easing, many businesses are feeling the pinch and are exploring their options in a bid to save costs.

art
  • 11 November 2024
  • Employment

Clarkslegal welcomes a new employment partner

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce the appointment of Katie Glendinning as a partner within our highly-ranked employment team.