Search

How can we help?

Icon

10 tips for challenging award of a contract

Download our publication here 

Before submitting a bid

1. Review the invitation to tender 

Does it contain any requirements which might breach one of the procurement principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency?
If so, you need to raise them now. It is not an option to wait and see if you win and only raise your complaints about the invitation to tender in the event you are unsuccessful.

2. Take note of correspondence 

Keep a note of any correspondence you have with the public body, including any requests for clarification you submit and any verbal discussions.
The timing of such discussions could be key to whether your claim is brought in time.

3. Monitor running of the tender 

Make sure you read and understand the response to any requests for clarification submitted by other bidders.

  • Photographs can be useful.
  • Records should also be kept of all staff training.
  • It should be signed, dated and reviewed as appropriate.

4. Submit your bid as required 

Ensure that you submit your bid, including all accompanying documents, on time and in the manner required by the invitation to tender. Your bid may not be considered and/or your scores may be penalised if you forget to attach a key document or upload the wrong version.

 

 

It is not an option to wait and see if you win and only raise your complaints about the invitation to tender in the event you are unsuccessful.

Once you receive the contract award notice

5. Share notice with bid team 

Share the notice with your bid team and obtain their urgent input on the decision. The people who drafted the individual sections of the bid are usually best placed to know if they have been marked fairly.

Consider whether the evaluators have properly understood your bid and if the marks you have received are consistent with the evaluators’ comments.
Has another bidder been given higher marks than you without good reason? What to do?

6. Check the terms 

A surprising number of the challenges we see are based on simple numerical errors in the scoring. Other common issues include weightings being incorrectly applied, too many or too few marks being awarded and marks being awarded on the basis of sub criteria not made available to the bidders.

It is more difficult, although not impossible, to bring a challenge on the basis that you simply believe that the score awarded is too low as evaluators are allowed a margin of appreciation and the courts will only interfere where there has been an obvious mistake.

7. Ask for further detail

If the information in the contract award notice is not sufficiently detailed for you to determine whether you have been marked fairly, ask the public body for further detail and a breakdown of the scoring.

8. Keep on top of deadlines 

There is a very limited period of time in which to challenge the award of a contract. The standstill period, during which the public authority cannot award the contract, runs for just ten days. The absolute limitation period for bringing a claim expires after 30 days.

9. Ask for an extension 

If you need more time, consider asking the public body to extend the standstill period. But do remember the extension of time cannot take you beyond 30 days from the contract award notice.

10. Request legal support 

Consult your lawyers at an early stage if you want to bring a challenge. Although quick turnarounds can be achieved, it is not ideal to leave this until the very end of the standstill period.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 24 November 2017
  • Employment

Failing to evidence right to work is not an excuse to dismiss an employee

In Baker v Abellio London Ltd, the EAT overturned the ET’s original finding of a fair dismissal for illegality. The ET had accepted that a Jamaican national with the right to live and work in the UK was fairly dismissed after his employer had suspended, and eventually dismissed him, after failing to provide documentary evidence of his right to work.

art
  • 24 November 2017
  • Employment

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Employment

Pension scheme did not discriminate workers

In Dr Parker v MDU Services Ltd, the claimant alleged that her employer’s pension scheme indirectly discriminated against workers who had a combination of full and part-time service.

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Employment

Deliveroo: Late substitution leads to a win against the run of play

The Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) has finally given its decision on whether a particular group of Deliveroo riders – those in the Camden/Kentish Town area of North London who are paid per delivery – are workers of Deliveroo or are independent suppliers of services to Deliveroo.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Will Uber work in the area again?

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has today upheld the ET decision that when the Uber drivers were in the work area, available for work and with Uber app switched on, they were workers with rights to national minimum wage, sick pay and holiday pay.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Michael Sippitt comments on Uber losing UK legal appeal against drivers’ rights

Taxi-hailing firm Uber has lost its appeal on Friday (10 November) against a ruling that its drivers should be classed as workers rather than self-employed.