Search

How can we help?

Icon

Company sued for not inviting employee on maternity to Christmas Party

A new mother who was not invited to her work Christmas party whilst on maternity leave has succeeded in her claim against her employer.

Catriona Howie’s superiors claimed they simply forgot to invite her to the party, as it had been a much more low-key affair that particular year, with employees simply gathering at a local pub and drinks being paid for by management. However, the tribunal ruled Mrs Howie had been overlooked because she was on maternity leave and that it merited compensation because of ‘injury to her feelings’.

Catriona Howie now stands to receive an award of compensation between £900 and £8,800 from her employer, luxury kitchen and design firm, Holloways Of Ludlow Design & Build Ltd. She will also receive £1,027 in unpaid wages and holiday pay.

Mrs Howie had brought claims of discrimination on the grounds of maternity, and a claim of unfair dismissal. As well as the Christmas party mishap, Mrs Howie explained to the tribunal that her employer had withheld information about its difficult financial position, a colleague had mocked her decision to name her new born daughter after Elvis Presley, and she was told her role was no longer required upon returning to work after the maternity leave.

Employers must not discriminate against a member of staff on the grounds of their pregnancy or maternity

Employers must not discriminate against a member of staff on the grounds of their pregnancy or maternity. Discrimination includes acts such as dismissal, changes in pay, or forcing them to work whilst on maternity leave. The law applies regardless of how long the person has been employed. Should you need any advice in relation to a pregnant member of staff, or a member of staff on maternity leave, please do not hesitate to contact our pregnancy & maternity discrimination lawyers.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.