Search

How can we help?

Icon

Unfair dismissal due to trade union activities

In the recent case of Cadent Gas Ltd v Singh the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal decision that an employee was automatically unfairly dismissed because of his trade union activities despite the fact that the disciplinary and appeal officers were not motivated by his union activities.

The Claimant was a health and safety trade union representative and a key element of his case was that the manager who conducted the disciplinary investigation into allegations of gross misconduct (which were unconnected to his union activities) was hostile towards the union of which the Claimant was part. There had also been historical tension between the two in relation to the Claimant’s trade union activities.

Although it was considered that neither the disciplinary nor the appeal officers were motivated in their decision-making by the employee’s union activities, it was found that the investigating manager had referred to the Claimant’s union status in his investigation and, amongst other things, had given incorrect information to HR and the dismissing officer. The decision to dismiss was therefore found to be attributable to the Claimant’s union activities.

Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal decision that an employee was automatically unfairly dismissed because of his trade union activities.

This case highlights the high degree of risk in trade union cases and employers must be aware of the serious implications if an employee is dismissed or subjected to a detriment because of their involvement in, or connection to, a trade union. Employers must also be aware that such cases do not require a minimum length of service, compensation for such dismissals is uncapped and serious reputational damage could be caused if a Claimant is successful.

If you have any concerns regarding trade union matters, please contact a member of our unfair dismissal lawyers who will be happy to assist.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 25 February 2026
  • Immigration

Dual Nationals Take Note: UK Travel Rules Changed on 25 February 2026

From 25 February 2026, important procedural changes came into force affecting how dual citizens travel to the United Kingdom.

Pub
  • 23 February 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: Planning for the Worst – Episode 2

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin for the second episode of our podcast series on shareholder disputes, where they explore what happens when business partners disagree.

art
  • 20 February 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMI Schemes – following the 2025 Autumn Statement

In an economic landscape where attracting, retaining and incentivising key employees is key to commercial success.

art
  • 19 February 2026

Clarkslegal’s international legal alliance TAGLaw achieves top “Elite” – Band 1 ranking by Chambers & Partners 2026

Clarkslegal’s international legal alliance, TAGLaw®, has again been recognised by Chambers & Partners as “Elite – Band 1” for 2026—the highest ranking awarded to legal networks and alliances.

art
  • 17 February 2026
  • Employment

The Employment Rights Act – A shift in power: why employers will face greater pressure from industrial action and union relations in 2026

Substantial union-related changes under the Employment Rights Act 2025 will take effect on 18 February 2026, ushering in significant shifts in the legal landscape for industrial action in the UK.

art
  • 16 February 2026
  • Immigration

High Potential Individual Visa (HPI Visa) – UK Immigration Route

The High Potential Individual (HPI) visa is a UK immigration route designed to attract recent graduates from top-ranked international universities.