Search

How can we help?

Icon

What happens if I fail jobs drug test?

It’s the morning after the night before, and you’ve done something that really wasn’t a good idea. And it just so happens that today is the one day in your career that your boss has decided to randomly drug test some of the workers.

Just your luck, right?

Well, it is completely legal for employers to request drugs tests from its staff when it has grounds to suspect substance abuse.

But if you do end up testing positive, the good news is that it does not necessarily mean you will be sacked on the spot.

Why you might be tested

Testing could be completely random, or it could be implemented because bosses suspect a staff member was inebriated while working.

However, drug testing is not yet sophisticated enough to determine when an individual was drunk or high – so it can be hard to prove it happened on company time.

Monica Atwal, managing partner and employment law specialist at Clarkslegal, told Metro.co.uk: ‘Some employers only test if there are other indicators of abuse or influence.

‘But others will randomly test so there is confidence that staff can perform critical roles such as drivers or those providing personal care such as nurses.’

Will you be sacked?

Companies will have differing policies, but there is a good chance that being under the influence on the job constitutes gross misconduct, and you will be sacked.

But it may depend on the type of drug, whether it was taken in or out of the workplace, and your job.

Ms Atwal said: ‘Employers will be under a duty to investigate the circumstances fully before taking disciplinary action.

‘An employee can face disciplinary action including dismissal if a test is positive and the investigation shows there was a clear rule and a fair process was followed.

‘It is highly likely that if you are under the influence at work you will lose your job. It’s a high price to pay for a high.’

Read full article here.

Chambers and Partners

“Very professional, knowledgeable and accessible lawyers.” 

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).