Search

How can we help?

Icon

New requirements for companies to reveal pay ratio between bosses and workers

The government has announced a series of reforms aimed at increasing boardroom accountability and enhancing trust in business. These are a partial implementation of pledges in the Conservative manifesto for the May 2017 general election, which itself was much less alarming to businesses than Theresa May’s July 2016 Conservative party leadership campaign pledge to have employees represented on company boards.

The proposals are that, on an annual basis:

  • around 900 listed companies will have to publish and justify the pay ratio between CEOs and their average UK worker;
  • all companies of a significant size will have to publicly explain how their directors take employees’ and shareholders’ interests into account;
  • all large companies will have to make their responsible business arrangements public.

Around 900 listed companies will have to publish and justify the pay ratio between CEOs and their average UK worker

There will also be:

  • A public register where a fifth (20%) of investors in a listed company have objected to management annual pay awards;
  • measures seeking to ensure employees’ interests are better represented at board level – this would be done by asking the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) to introduce a new requirement in the UK Corporate Governance Code.

The code works on a “comply or explain basis.” Businesses would either have to assign a non-executive director to represent employees, create an employee advisory council, nominate a director from the workforce, or explain why they have not implemented any of the above measures. The government will also ask the FRC to develop a set of entirely voluntary corporate governance principles for large private companies.

The government intends to bring these legislative measures into effect by June 2018. However, due to present political uncertainty and competing priorities it would not be surprising if the proposed measures were shelved for the time being, or perhaps even indefinitely.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 23 July 2026
  • Immigration

New Priority Service for British citizenship applications: Faster decisions now available

The Home Office has introduced a new Priority Service for British citizenship applications, allowing eligible applicants to receive a decision on their naturalisation or registration application in around 30 working days, rather than waiting the standard processing time of up to six months.

Pub
  • 21 July 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Quarterly Insights: Key Corporate & Commercial Topics – Q3 2026

Join Stuart Mullins and Jonathan Hayes as they explore the most topical corporate and commercial issues, along with key developments our team has examined over the past three months. In Q3, they discuss CICs, company registers, and the use of NDAs in business sales and exits.

art
  • 20 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Personal Data FAQs

Explore comprehensive answers to frequently asked questions about personal data, GDPR compliance, and your rights.

art
  • 16 July 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMIs – The basics

Discover the essentials of Enterprise Management Incentives (EMIs), an HMRC-approved employee share scheme offering tax advantages. Learn how EMIs incentivise staff, eligibility requirements, and how Clarkslegal can help tailor a scheme for you.

Pub
  • 15 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 overhaul: The end of Terms of Reference and future trends – Episode 3

In this final episode, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) discuss the impact of the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 overhaul, focusing on the end of Terms of Reference. Hear expert insights and practical tips for adapting to the new rules.

art
  • 15 July 2026
  • Employment

New guidance on interim relief: More applications, same high threshold

In certain limited unfair dismissal claims (such as those for automatic unfair dismissal relating to a protected disclosure) claimants can apply for interim relief. This is an emergency measure which essentially prevents a dismissal from taking effect until the claim has been heard.