Search

How can we help?

Icon

Tribunal Fees: Resurrecting rejected claims?

The Supreme Court decision on 26 July 2017 that Employment Tribunal fees were unlawful was expected to have wide-ranging repercussions.

This week, one further likely consequence of the decision has been highlighted.

Between July 2013 and July 2017, an issue fee was payable when an ET claim was started and a further fee was payable in order to proceed to final hearing.

At the issue stage, Claimants could submit their claim without paying and apply for the fee to be waived. For this application to succeed, the Claimant had to prove their income and/or assets were below a certain level. Claimants whose applications were unsuccessful and did not pay the fee would have their claims rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees.

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

Now that the fees regime has been found to have been unlawful from its introduction, there is an opportunity for individuals whose claims were rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees to apply to the ET for their claims to be reinstated.

 

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

This week, the Presidents of the Employment Tribunals have ordered that decisions on this kind of case will be put on hold until the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS (the courts and tribunals service) decides how to handle this issue.

While this introduces new uncertainty regarding complaints which businesses probably thought were historic, it is important to clarify that it will not reopen matters which have been settled by settlement agreement or via ACAS.

If you are concerned about how this may impact you or your business, please contact our employment team.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 20 May 2026
  • Immigration

AI vs Home Office approved Translations – why migrants are paying the price

AI is transforming almost every professional sector. Law firms now use AI-assisted drafting, businesses rely on automated translation software, and governments increasingly use digital systems for decision-making.

art
  • 20 May 2026
  • Employment

Trade Unions Right of Access from October – What you need to know

Under the Employment Rights Act 2025, independent Trade Unions (i.e. those with a certificate of independence) will have a right to access workplaces (physically and digitally) from October 2026.

art
  • 19 May 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

New Complaints Procedure for Data Protection Coming in June – Are You Ready?

The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (the “Act”) received Royal Assent last year and introduces slight reforms to the UK’s data protection regime.

art
  • 18 May 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Land Registry title to property mines and minerals

Depending on the location of the property, it is quite common in parts of England and Wales for a property title to contain a reference to mines and minerals, and for these to be excluded from the surface owner’s ownership in favour of another party.

art
  • 13 May 2026
  • Employment

10 top tips for negotiating a redundancy settlement agreement, for employers and employees

Redundancies are on the rise, resulting in increased use of settlement agreements. We’ve compiled our top 10 tips for drafting and negotiating these agreements to support both employers and employees through this challenging process.

art
  • 12 May 2026
  • Immigration

Supplementary Employment: When is it Allowed under UK Immigration Rules?

This article provides a guidance to understanding the rules on supplementary employment in the UK.