Search

How can we help?

Icon

Tribunal Fees: Resurrecting rejected claims?

The Supreme Court decision on 26 July 2017 that Employment Tribunal fees were unlawful was expected to have wide-ranging repercussions.

This week, one further likely consequence of the decision has been highlighted.

Between July 2013 and July 2017, an issue fee was payable when an ET claim was started and a further fee was payable in order to proceed to final hearing.

At the issue stage, Claimants could submit their claim without paying and apply for the fee to be waived. For this application to succeed, the Claimant had to prove their income and/or assets were below a certain level. Claimants whose applications were unsuccessful and did not pay the fee would have their claims rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees.

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

Now that the fees regime has been found to have been unlawful from its introduction, there is an opportunity for individuals whose claims were rejected or dismissed for non-payment of fees to apply to the ET for their claims to be reinstated.

 

At the hearing fee stage, where the Claimant did not pay the fee and had not successfully applied for the fees to be waived, the claim would be rejected or dismissed.

This week, the Presidents of the Employment Tribunals have ordered that decisions on this kind of case will be put on hold until the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS (the courts and tribunals service) decides how to handle this issue.

While this introduces new uncertainty regarding complaints which businesses probably thought were historic, it is important to clarify that it will not reopen matters which have been settled by settlement agreement or via ACAS.

If you are concerned about how this may impact you or your business, please contact our employment team.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 28 October 2025
  • Immigration

Supplementary Employment: When is it Allowed under UK Immigration Rules?

This article provides a guidance to understanding the rules on supplementary employment in the UK.

art
  • 24 October 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Navigating the building regulations regime in commercial property transactions

Building control is said to be one of the earliest forms of local government in England, with the modern building regulations progressing in the aftermath of the Great Fire of London.

art
  • 23 October 2025
  • Employment Rights Bill

Government launches Employment Rights Bill consultations – key changes employers need to know

The Employment Rights Bill is a draft law set to significantly expand workers’ rights. The Government has now launched the first round of consultations.

art
  • 23 October 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

AI and Data Protection – Is Fair and Transparent Privacy Possible?

We live in a digital world. Every facet of daily life is governed to some degree by phone, web or some form of connected technology.

art
  • 16 October 2025

Chambers and Partners 2026: Clarkslegal’s continued commitment to excellence

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners as a leading firm in their 2026 guide.

art
  • 15 October 2025
  • Immigration

Registering a child as a British Citizen: A guide to section 3(1) applications

This article explains the process of registering a child as a British citizen under section 3(1), including the eligibility criteria, the Home Office approach, and key factors that influence whether an application is approved.