Search

How can we help?

Icon

Starbucks lose disability discrimination claim brought by claimant with dyslexia

Starbucks have made the headlines having been found to have unlawfully discriminated and victimised an employee with dyslexia in a judgment issued by the Employment Tribunal this week.

Ms Kumulchew was employed by Starbucks as a Shift Supervisor, and struggled with reading and comprehending information due to her dyslexia.

Her responsibilities included recording fridge and water temperatures at specific times in the day.  Due to her condition, she made incorrect temperature entries but her line managers accused her of falsifying these recordings.  During the disciplinary process, the manager insisted she prove that she had dyslexia, and required her to produce a certificate.  Starbucks did not seek a medical opinion on her condition and the effect it had upon her, and issued her with a written warning.

The Tribunal found amongst other things that the disciplinary process and written warnings amounted to discrimination arising from disability contrary to section 13 Equality Act 2010. Due to failures to provide typed disciplinary notes in a timely fashion, the Tribunal also found that this caused Ms Kumulchew further disadvantage due to her dyslexia and there was a failure to make reasonable adjustments to the disciplinary process.

The Tribunal also found that the written warning was issued because Ms Kumulchew had made allegations of discrimination, so was also an act of unlawful victimisation against her.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Chambers and Partners

The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.

Whilst this case does not appear to establish any new principle of law, it is a clear example and reminder of the wide range of protections available to disabled employees in the workplace and the multiple liabilities employers can face if they fail to comply with the Equality Act 2010.

In particular, none of the ill-treatment Ms Kumulchew received was found to be directly on the grounds of her having dyslexia and a disability per se, but her written warning, issued as a result of her error in recording temperatures was found to be in relation to something arising from her disability, which is sufficient to contravene section 13 Equality Act 2010.  The section 13 claim is proving to be a relatively broad protection available to disabled employees since its introduction under the 2010 Act.

The case also demonstrates that even for large multinational companies with detailed equality policies in place, it is important to ensure managers are fully aware of their legal obligations, particularly in managing disabled employees and laudable guidelines must be implemented in practice.

We understand that a remedies hearing in this case is to be scheduled, where the claimant will likely to be eligible for a significant injuries to feelings award for the discrimination she had suffered.

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 26 March 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

AI Podcast: AI and Data Security

In the third and final podcast in our ‘AI Podcast’ trilogy, members of the data protection team, will be discussing how to use AI to process data safely. They will be looking closely at the risks for businesses and the types of data security protections you can put in place.

art
  • 26 March 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Key considerations for data retention policies

In the ever-evolving landscape of data protection regulations, data retention stands as a crucial aspect of compliance and risk management for organisations across industries.

art
  • 21 March 2024
  • Immigration

What is a right to work share code?

A right to work share code is a unique 9-character alphanumeric code generated via the UK Government website. This initiative has been implemented by the UK Government to verify an individual’s right to work online.

Pub
  • 21 March 2024
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Who Transfers?

In this fifth podcast in our TUPE Podcast Series, Amanda Glover will be focusing on ‘who transfers’ under TUPE. Looking at the definition of ‘employee’ under TUPE legislation and the tests that apply in deciding if those employees transfer.

art
  • 20 March 2024
  • Employment

Changes to Employment Laws from April 2024 – are you ready?

There’s a large number of employment law changes coming in April which are set to shake up the workplace. It’s crucial for employers to stay informed and prepared.

art
  • 19 March 2024
  • Employment

Instant Messaging in the Workplace: Factors to be aware of

Workplaces have changed beyond recognition in the four years since the first COVID-19 lockdowns. This anniversary represents an opportunity to look back at how workplaces have changed in that period, from the increased use of flexible and hybrid working, to the continuing and significant integration of more technology in office-based work.