Search

How can we help?

Icon

Employer’s reasonable and genuine belief can be sufficient for SOSR dismissal

In Nayak v Royal Mail Group, the EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision that an employer’s genuine and reasonable belief that an employee was no longer permitted to work in the UK was sufficient to show that he had been dismissed for some other substantial reason (SOSR).

It is Royal Mail’s policy to conduct employee immigration checks every six months where visa outcomes are pending.  Mr Nayak worked under a number of visas throughout his employment at Royal Mail (RM) and, upon expiry of his visa in 2010, applied for a Tier 4 (General) student migrant visa.  Whilst this was originally refused, he successfully appealed and his application was passed to the Home Office for consideration and processing.

Mr Nayak’s situation meant that he was subject to RM’s immigration check policy.  However, when asked to provide proof of his right to work in the UK on three occasions between August 2012 and February 2013, he failed to cooperate with RM’s requests.  Further enquiries were made of him between December 2013 and May 2014 and he was told that the right to work could only last whilst his visa application remained pending.  Given that his application had been made more than four years previously, and in the absence of any evidence of his immigration status, RM could not simply assume that it remained pending.  Mr Nayak was advised that his failure to provide the requisite evidence may result in his dismissal and, when he did not do so, was dismissed.  His appeal was unsuccessful and he brought a claim for unfair dismissal.

 

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

The EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision that an employer’s genuine and reasonable belief that an employee was no longer permitted to work in the UK was sufficient to show that he had been dismissed for SOSR.

The claim was dismissed both at first instance (by the tribunal) and on appeal.  The EAT upheld the tribunal’s decision that an employer’s genuine and reasonable belief that an employee was no longer permitted to work in the UK was sufficient to show that he had been dismissed for SOSR.  There was adequate evidence that RM had attempted to establish Mr Nayak’s immigration status over a number of years and he had continually failed to cooperate in the process.

The case demonstrates that a dismissal for SOSR can be justified by the employer’s genuine and reasonable belief.  This is in contrast to a statutory restriction dismissal (which is another potentially fair ground for dismissal) where an employer’s actual knowledge is required.

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 26 March 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

AI Podcast: AI and Data Security

In the third and final podcast in our ‘AI Podcast’ trilogy, members of the data protection team, will be discussing how to use AI to process data safely. They will be looking closely at the risks for businesses and the types of data security protections you can put in place.

art
  • 26 March 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Key considerations for data retention policies

In the ever-evolving landscape of data protection regulations, data retention stands as a crucial aspect of compliance and risk management for organisations across industries.

art
  • 21 March 2024
  • Immigration

What is a right to work share code?

A right to work share code is a unique 9-character alphanumeric code generated via the UK Government website. This initiative has been implemented by the UK Government to verify an individual’s right to work online.

Pub
  • 21 March 2024
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Who Transfers?

In this fifth podcast in our TUPE Podcast Series, Amanda Glover will be focusing on ‘who transfers’ under TUPE. Looking at the definition of ‘employee’ under TUPE legislation and the tests that apply in deciding if those employees transfer.

art
  • 20 March 2024
  • Employment

Changes to Employment Laws from April 2024 – are you ready?

There’s a large number of employment law changes coming in April which are set to shake up the workplace. It’s crucial for employers to stay informed and prepared.

art
  • 19 March 2024
  • Employment

Instant Messaging in the Workplace: Factors to be aware of

Workplaces have changed beyond recognition in the four years since the first COVID-19 lockdowns. This anniversary represents an opportunity to look back at how workplaces have changed in that period, from the increased use of flexible and hybrid working, to the continuing and significant integration of more technology in office-based work.