Search

How can we help?

Icon

UK Data Protection – Where are we now?

There have been many developments relating to how data flows are governed, ranging from the standard contractual clauses (SCCs) to the notable Schrems II decision; following this, the UK was deemed an ‘adequate’ country by the EU in respect of personal data transfers. Earlier this year, the Secretary of State laid before Parliament the International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA), the international data transfer addendum to the European Commission’s standard contractual clauses for international data transfers (Addendum) and a document setting out transitional provisions. In a post-Brexit world, the UK has also explored a data protection reform bill to reshape its approach to regulation outside of the EU. So, where are we now with the UK data protection regime and what should organisations look out for?

What is the IDTA and how does it work?

The UK’s independent data protection regulator, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), prepared the IDTA, which came into force on 21 March 2022. Where UK-based organisations will export personal data to third countries (such as the USA), which are not covered by an adequacy decision, they will be able to choose between the IDTA and the Addendum to transfer personal data outside the UK. This will depend on whether the personal data is solely being exported by the UK (where the IDTA would be appropriate), or both the UK and the EEA (where the Addendum would be appropriate, particularly for global organisations). The ICO has provided further guidance on what restricted transfers are in its ‘Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR)’. In general terms, the IDTA contains mandatory clauses which the data importer and exporter will need to comply with, but also provides the opportunity to refer to other data processing and data sharing agreements the parties may have in place.

What are the key dates to look out for?

It is important to note that contracts concluded on or before 21 September 2022 on the basis of the old EU Standard Contractual Clauses (EU SCCs) can remain in place unchanged and will provide adequate safeguards until 21 March 2024, where the data being transferred is only being exported from the UK.

However, for new contracts for data transfers from the UK entered into after 21 September 2022, the UK Addendum to the new EU SCCs or the IDTA will need to be used, though new contracts have been able to adopt these since the IDTA had come into force from 21 March 2022.

Melanie Pimenta

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4653

Following the UK’s adequacy decision, we see the UK move away from the EU’s approach on data protection to adopt and focus on a risk-based approach with the aim of reducing administrative burdens and supporting economic growth.

What next steps should organisations take?

With these dates in mind, and when considering whether to enter into an IDTA, organisations, particularly in light of any company restructures, mergers or takeovers, should now seek to understand their data flows, particularly in terms of whether there are data flows between the UK, the EEA and/or third countries or if the nature of the processing has changed.

Organisations will then need to undertake a transfer risk assessment to better understand the safeguards and security requirements they will need to implement to protect the personal data.

Importers and exporters will need to be clear on the types of personal data that will be transferred, data subjects, security requirements and any extra protections and safeguards arising from transfer risk assessments. The IDTA considers other separate “linked agreements” in which data importers and exporters will need to consider if such data processing or data sharing agreements includes all the personal data and data flows involved, with consideration to the requirements and terminology in the UK GDPR. For example, it may be that such linked agreements need to be updated to be compliant with the UK GDPR or if the processing of the personal data has changed since the parties entered into a new agreement for services.

In the meantime, we await further guidance on the transfer risk assessment and will monitor how the increasing use of the IDTAs and Addendums will shape the data protection landscape.

Overall, this has been a crucial year for data protection in which, following the UK’s adequacy decision, we see the UK move away from the EU’s approach on data protection to adopt and focus on a risk-based approach with the aim of reducing administrative burdens and supporting economic growth. However, a crucial aspect will be to see whether any further changes to the data protection regime by the UK could risk the UK’s adequacy decision being impacted.

 

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Melanie Pimenta

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4653

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Employment

Pension scheme did not discriminate workers

In Dr Parker v MDU Services Ltd, the claimant alleged that her employer’s pension scheme indirectly discriminated against workers who had a combination of full and part-time service.

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Immigration

Government doubles visas for exceptional talented individuals

On Wednesday, the government announced its intentions to double the number of visas to individuals who show promise in the technology, science, art and creative industries. Home Secretary Amber Rudd confirmed that the number of visas available through the Tier 1 Exceptional Talent route will increase from 1,000 to 2,000 a year.

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Employment

Deliveroo: Late substitution leads to a win against the run of play

The Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) has finally given its decision on whether a particular group of Deliveroo riders – those in the Camden/Kentish Town area of North London who are paid per delivery – are workers of Deliveroo or are independent suppliers of services to Deliveroo.

art
  • 14 November 2017
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

When Can I Refuse To Mediate?

Anyone who has been involved in a legal dispute will have been told to consider engaging in some form of alternative dispute resolution, most often mediation, before the issue of proceedings.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Will Uber work in the area again?

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has today upheld the ET decision that when the Uber drivers were in the work area, available for work and with Uber app switched on, they were workers with rights to national minimum wage, sick pay and holiday pay.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Commercial Real Estate

Liability For Reduction In Value Of Neighbouring Properties Due To Japanese Knotweed

Japanese Knotweed is a fast-growing invasive species and is a significant problem because it can cause physical damage to buildings and land. It is expensive and time consuming to permanently remove. Clarkslegal was instructed on the sale of a development site which was delayed for over a year when the buyer found Japanese Knotweed on site and insisted that the seller remove it before completion.