Search

How can we help?

Icon

The work/life balancing act – time to think more flexibly?

As we come to the end of ‘National Work Life Balance Week’, it is an ideal moment for employers to take stock and reflect on whether they are striking the right balance in their workplaces.

Supported by Working Families, the Week’s focus has been on ‘increasing access to flexible working and finding the flex in every role’, which the charity argues is more important than ever given the spiralling cost-of-living crisis.

Flexible working has become almost synonymous with working from home, thanks chiefly to the number of office-based businesses that have embraced remote or hybrid roles over the past three years.

However, this is not an option for the many ‘place-based’ workers (those who can only perform their roles in specific locations) and the current homeworking focus may have led to a belief that flexible working is something only office workers can access.

This Work Life Balance Week is challenging this perception, encouraging employers to take a broader view of what it means to work flexibly and move beyond the focus on location. It suggests employers could look instead to options such as job-sharing, introducing variable hours or staggering start and finish times.

Of course, such changes are easy enough to talk about, and more difficult to implement. Employers have a range of competing interests to manage, from maintaining sufficient staffing levels, to ensuring their workers can still communicate and collaborate effectively, to establishing clear lines of management to provide support and feedback.

It suggests employers could look instead to options such as job-sharing, introducing variable hours or staggering start and finish times.

Employers should also note what is included in their workers’ contracts and consider what impact a new flexible way of working could have on their terms and conditions. In addition, employers must be careful to treat all workers fairly when assessing flexible working options, in order to avoid potential discrimination issues.

If a business can strike the right balance, however, then it may well pay dividends in both recruitment and retention.

Parents are a group Working Families have a particular focus on, and their recent YouGov poll found that 82% of parents would apply for a role if it advertised flexible working, compared to just 31% who would apply for a role that did not advertise flexible working.

A willingness to discuss what flexible options can be offered could open opportunities to groups that may otherwise have been found it difficult to access the workplace (those who have caring responsibilities or health concerns for example) and give employers access to a greater talent pool in a difficult job market.

Flexible working could also provide the antidote to the ‘Great Resignation’ and the new trend of “quiet-quitting”. Flexible working options, whether location or hours, can give employees the chance to improve their own work-life balance; it could give parents more time with their children, allow time for interests outside of work, or simply ease the stress of balancing their competing obligations to both home and work. In turn, this can lead to improved employee engagement and therefore happier, more productive staff.

If you need advice on how to introduce flexible working to your workplace, our experienced Employment Team are on hand to help.

 

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 24 November 2017
  • Employment

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Employment

Pension scheme did not discriminate workers

In Dr Parker v MDU Services Ltd, the claimant alleged that her employer’s pension scheme indirectly discriminated against workers who had a combination of full and part-time service.

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Employment

Deliveroo: Late substitution leads to a win against the run of play

The Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) has finally given its decision on whether a particular group of Deliveroo riders – those in the Camden/Kentish Town area of North London who are paid per delivery – are workers of Deliveroo or are independent suppliers of services to Deliveroo.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Will Uber work in the area again?

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has today upheld the ET decision that when the Uber drivers were in the work area, available for work and with Uber app switched on, they were workers with rights to national minimum wage, sick pay and holiday pay.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Michael Sippitt comments on Uber losing UK legal appeal against drivers’ rights

Taxi-hailing firm Uber has lost its appeal on Friday (10 November) against a ruling that its drivers should be classed as workers rather than self-employed.

art
  • 10 November 2017
  • Employment

The importance of understanding the economic entity in a TUPE situation

For there to be a business transfer under TUPE there must be an ‘economic entity’ that retains its identity post-transfer.