Search

How can we help?

Icon

Can a pay less notice apply to two applications?  

The consequences of failing to serve a valid pay less notice can be severe.  In the recent case Advance JV v Enisca, this led to the contractor being liable to pay its subcontractor £2.7 million more than it considered was the proper entitlement.  It is an interesting case in which the court summarised the law and dismissed Advance’s creative attempts to avoid these consequences.

Construction contracts must have a payment mechanism that complies with the Housing Grants Construction Regeneration Act 1996 (the Act).  Parties can amend standard form contracts if they still meet the mandatory criteria of the Act.

A contract must provide for the submission of an application for payment (AFP) and a payment notice certifying the sum to be paid.  If the paying party does not want to pay the sum (or no payment notice has been served) it must serve a pay less notice.

The key dates in Advance JV were:

  • 22 October 2021 – AFP 24
  • 19 November 2021 – AFP 25
  • 24 November 2021 – pay less notice against AFP 25
  • 25 November 2021 – deadline for pay less notice against AFP 24

There was no payment notice or pay less notice expressly served in for AFP 24 and, based on this failure, Enisca sought a ‘smash and grab’ adjudication award.  It succeeded and Advance JV brought a Part 8 claim for a declaration that there was in fact an effective pay less notice against AFP 25.

If the paying party does not want to pay the sum (or no payment notice has been served) it must serve a pay less notice.

By a quirk of the bespoke amendments to the contract, the pay less notice for AFP 25 was served prior to the deadline for AFP 25.  Advance JV argued that it should either be understood as referring to AFP 24 or could apply as a pay less notice against both applications.

These arguments failed.  The 24 November pay less notice expressly referred to AFP 25 and was based on the assessment date and the calculations for AFP 25.

A reasonable recipient would have understood it to refer to AFP 25 and only AFP 25.  It was not possible for a pay less notice to apply to two separate AFPs.  Accordingly, Advance JV was liable to pay in full AFP 24.

As well as being a further reminder of the importance of issuing timely notices in response to applications for payment, the case gives a helpful summary of how the court will interpret such notices.

 

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Immigration

Government doubles visas for exceptional talented individuals

On Wednesday, the government announced its intentions to double the number of visas to individuals who show promise in the technology, science, art and creative industries. Home Secretary Amber Rudd confirmed that the number of visas available through the Tier 1 Exceptional Talent route will increase from 1,000 to 2,000 a year.

art
  • 17 November 2017
  • Employment

Deliveroo: Late substitution leads to a win against the run of play

The Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) has finally given its decision on whether a particular group of Deliveroo riders – those in the Camden/Kentish Town area of North London who are paid per delivery – are workers of Deliveroo or are independent suppliers of services to Deliveroo.

art
  • 14 November 2017
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

When Can I Refuse To Mediate?

Anyone who has been involved in a legal dispute will have been told to consider engaging in some form of alternative dispute resolution, most often mediation, before the issue of proceedings.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Will Uber work in the area again?

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has today upheld the ET decision that when the Uber drivers were in the work area, available for work and with Uber app switched on, they were workers with rights to national minimum wage, sick pay and holiday pay.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Commercial Real Estate

Liability For Reduction In Value Of Neighbouring Properties Due To Japanese Knotweed

Japanese Knotweed is a fast-growing invasive species and is a significant problem because it can cause physical damage to buildings and land. It is expensive and time consuming to permanently remove. Clarkslegal was instructed on the sale of a development site which was delayed for over a year when the buyer found Japanese Knotweed on site and insisted that the seller remove it before completion.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Michael Sippitt comments on Uber losing UK legal appeal against drivers’ rights

Taxi-hailing firm Uber has lost its appeal on Friday (10 November) against a ruling that its drivers should be classed as workers rather than self-employed.