Search

How can we help?

Icon

Landowner obligations in respect of tenant’s waste and fly-tipping

Figures by local authorities in England suggest that in 2020/2021; 1.3 million fly tipping incidents were dealt with, an increase of 16% from the reported cases in 2019. (Fly tipping statistics for England, 2020 to 2021)This note, gives a brief overview of some of the issues to aware of:

Landowner’s concerns

Fly-tipping is an offence under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, incurring not only financial penalties but also potential imprisonment. Owners of land should be aware of the following obligations in respect of their sites:

Deposit of waste

Landowners will usually require a permit or an exemption to allow waste onto their land. This includes both depositing controlled waste on their land and “knowingly permitting” this to be done (Environmental Protection Act 1990 s.33).

A ‘knowing permitter’ can include a landlord who is, or could reasonably be expected to be, aware that controlled waste has collected on their land in breach of their tenant’s lease, but has taken no action to remedy the breach. It is therefore advisable to report any potential tipping by a tenant to the relevant local authority or environment agency to avoid accusation of having ‘knowingly permitted’ the waste.

‘Knowingly permitting’ controlled waste on land is a criminal offence – this can lead to a term of imprisonment of up to 5 years as well as an unlimited fine, to include the costs of investigation as well as the cleanup of the site.

Management and storage

Landowners are required to manage their land to minimise risks to visitors, which can include ensuring that fly-tipped waste does not cause harm to visitors, whether or not the landowner has invited them to their premises. (Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957,1984; Health and Safety at Work Act 1974).

The Environment Agency has published a Regulatory Position Statement providing that fly-tipped waste can be stored on a temporary basis without a permit at a site other than where it was discovered under certain prescribed circumstances, pending recovery or disposal of the waste elsewhere.

Fly-tipping is an offence under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, incurring not only financial penalties but also potential imprisonment.

Disposal

Local Councils will not generally clear waste deposited on private land free of charge, though they may investigate incidents of fly tipping that arise. Where a successful prosecution is brought, the Council can apply for the Court to order that the landowner’s clean-up costs be reimbursed.

In most cases, it will be the landowner who is responsible for ensuring that the waste is disposed of correctly. A landlord must ensure that whoever is employed to collect and dispose of the waste is a registered waste carrier (see the gov.uk website for a list of authorised waste carriers) (Environmental Protection Act 1990 s.34).

Where this requirement is breached, a landlord can be liable to pay an unlimited fine.

To summarise, it is important that landowners are aware of their liabilities under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other statutory measures and take the necessary action to prevent fly-tipping, as the implications for leaving waste on land can be onerous. Through careful site management, including the use of CCTV, regular clearance of overgrown areas to improve sightlines and co-operating with neighbours to report on any waste discovered, landowners can work to limit incidents and create a safe environment for their tenants and employees alike

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 14 November 2017
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

When Can I Refuse To Mediate?

Anyone who has been involved in a legal dispute will have been told to consider engaging in some form of alternative dispute resolution, most often mediation, before the issue of proceedings.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Will Uber work in the area again?

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has today upheld the ET decision that when the Uber drivers were in the work area, available for work and with Uber app switched on, they were workers with rights to national minimum wage, sick pay and holiday pay.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Commercial Real Estate

Liability For Reduction In Value Of Neighbouring Properties Due To Japanese Knotweed

Japanese Knotweed is a fast-growing invasive species and is a significant problem because it can cause physical damage to buildings and land. It is expensive and time consuming to permanently remove. Clarkslegal was instructed on the sale of a development site which was delayed for over a year when the buyer found Japanese Knotweed on site and insisted that the seller remove it before completion.

art
  • 13 November 2017
  • Employment

Michael Sippitt comments on Uber losing UK legal appeal against drivers’ rights

Taxi-hailing firm Uber has lost its appeal on Friday (10 November) against a ruling that its drivers should be classed as workers rather than self-employed.

art
  • 10 November 2017
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Most organisations failing to inform users about use of their personal data

The ICO has led a global investigation of website privacy communications on behalf of the Global Privacy Enforcement Network (GPEN) and found many organisations’ data protection practices are lacking.

art
  • 10 November 2017
  • Employment

The importance of understanding the economic entity in a TUPE situation

For there to be a business transfer under TUPE there must be an ‘economic entity’ that retains its identity post-transfer.