Search

How can we help?

Icon

A Brief Overview of the Law Relating to Late Delivery

When purchasing a car, consumers want their new vehicle as soon as possible.  If you look at any internet car forum or motoring magazine these days, it is not uncommon to find complaints about the late delivery of new vehicles and enquiries about what legal action consumers can take.

The two main options are: (i) terminating the contract and refusing to take delivery of the new vehicle when it is ready, and/or (ii) seeking compensation.

Typically, sale contracts used by retailers do not allow the purchaser to terminate straightaway due to late delivery of the vehicle.  The contract would have to specifically state that time for delivery was “of the essence” or words to that effect for the consumer to have an immediate right to terminate.  For obvious reasons, retailers do not include this term in their sale contracts and often will say exactly the opposite.  Merely including a date for delivery in the agreement does not automatically make time of the essence.

In cases where the sale contract does not make time for delivery ‘of the essence’, a consumer who has been subjected to unreasonable delay may be able to impose a deadline for delivery by serving notice on the retailer.  If that deadline is missed, the consumer may then be able to terminate the contract, demand a refund of the deposit and seek compensation.  It should be noted however that some legal commentators disagree with this view, so dealers should always take specific legal advice if served with or relying upon such a notice.

In some cases, compensation claims may be substantial where, for example, the consumer has to pay more to buy the same vehicle from another retailer.  Even in cases where the compensation claim is low value, the dealer will still have lost the profit they would have made on the transaction and no doubt have sent the customer in the direction of one of their competitors.

In cases where the right to terminate has not arisen, the customer cannot withdraw from the agreement and remains liable to pay the agreed purchase price.  They may still be entitled, however, to claim compensation from the dealer for late delivery.

If that deadline is missed, the consumer may then be able to terminate the contract, demand a refund of the deposit and seek compensation.

If the contract does not state a date for delivery, English law provides that the vehicle should be delivered by the seller within a reasonable time.  What is ‘reasonable’ will depend on the facts of each case.  It is arguable, however, that a longer period for delivery may be regarded as reasonable in the case of a hand built, supercar, than in the case of a mass produced, family hatchback.

Most dealers will already have comprehensive Terms and Conditions in place that deal with late delivery.  Dealers should note however that the late delivery of goods has been recognised as a major source of consumer discord and that the law in this area may be tightened.  In the meantime, dealers would be wise not to commit to unrealistic delivery dates.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 06 October 2017
  • Employment

TUPE regulations apply even where large part of job becomes automated

In Anglo Beef Processors v Longland and Meat & Livestock Commercial Services, Mr Longland had been employed as a carcass service officer for Meat & Livestock, manually classifying carcasses in an abattoir.Mr Longland claimed at tribunal that the TUPE Regulations applied and as a result, he should transfer to Anglo Beef on the basis that the activities carried out were “fundamentally the same” both before and after the transfer

art
  • 06 October 2017
  • Commercial Real Estate

Real estate fraud – help us help you to eliminate the risk

One of the biggest benefits of the digital and information age has been the increased agility in carrying transactions – these are now able to take place almost instantaneously. This increased agility has brought with it the problem of increased vulnerability – especially to the risk of fraud.

art
  • 03 October 2017
  • Construction

Off-Site Goods and Materials: Legal Issues

There is no doubt that off-site manufacture is being embraced by the industry.

art
  • 03 October 2017
  • Construction

A victory for common sense – actual cost relevant to compensation event assessment

A defining principle of the NEC3 is that the parties should deal with issues as they arise and not save these up to the end. Hence the provision in the standard form contract allowing for forecast assessments of compensation events. However, this principle can get forgotten when the parties fail to comply with the contractual machinery and timeframes or the compensation events are disputed. A case from earlier this year in the Northern Ireland courts has looked at the question of whether actual costs are relevant to the assessment of compensation events: Northern Ireland Housing Executive…

art
  • 28 September 2017

Michael Sippitt writes for Thomson Reuters on: Migration and Modern Slavery

Until lawyers start to pursue high-profile negligence cases, the status quo is likely to remain unchanged.Modern slavery is a term that has entered our political and legal lexicon over the past decade or so but it is still something that is largely misunderstood.

art
  • 19 September 2017
  • Construction

Modern slavery in construction supply chains: does your business comply

‘Modern Slavery’ is a term which encapsulates slavery, servitude, forced or compulsory labour, and human trafficking.