Search

How can we help?

Icon

A Brief Overview of the Law Relating to Late Delivery

When purchasing a car, consumers want their new vehicle as soon as possible.  If you look at any internet car forum or motoring magazine these days, it is not uncommon to find complaints about the late delivery of new vehicles and enquiries about what legal action consumers can take.

The two main options are: (i) terminating the contract and refusing to take delivery of the new vehicle when it is ready, and/or (ii) seeking compensation.

Typically, sale contracts used by retailers do not allow the purchaser to terminate straightaway due to late delivery of the vehicle.  The contract would have to specifically state that time for delivery was “of the essence” or words to that effect for the consumer to have an immediate right to terminate.  For obvious reasons, retailers do not include this term in their sale contracts and often will say exactly the opposite.  Merely including a date for delivery in the agreement does not automatically make time of the essence.

In cases where the sale contract does not make time for delivery ‘of the essence’, a consumer who has been subjected to unreasonable delay may be able to impose a deadline for delivery by serving notice on the retailer.  If that deadline is missed, the consumer may then be able to terminate the contract, demand a refund of the deposit and seek compensation.  It should be noted however that some legal commentators disagree with this view, so dealers should always take specific legal advice if served with or relying upon such a notice.

In some cases, compensation claims may be substantial where, for example, the consumer has to pay more to buy the same vehicle from another retailer.  Even in cases where the compensation claim is low value, the dealer will still have lost the profit they would have made on the transaction and no doubt have sent the customer in the direction of one of their competitors.

In cases where the right to terminate has not arisen, the customer cannot withdraw from the agreement and remains liable to pay the agreed purchase price.  They may still be entitled, however, to claim compensation from the dealer for late delivery.

If that deadline is missed, the consumer may then be able to terminate the contract, demand a refund of the deposit and seek compensation.

If the contract does not state a date for delivery, English law provides that the vehicle should be delivered by the seller within a reasonable time.  What is ‘reasonable’ will depend on the facts of each case.  It is arguable, however, that a longer period for delivery may be regarded as reasonable in the case of a hand built, supercar, than in the case of a mass produced, family hatchback.

Most dealers will already have comprehensive Terms and Conditions in place that deal with late delivery.  Dealers should note however that the late delivery of goods has been recognised as a major source of consumer discord and that the law in this area may be tightened.  In the meantime, dealers would be wise not to commit to unrealistic delivery dates.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 07 November 2017
  • Construction

An uncertain future for Smash & Grab adjudication

recent decision in the Technology and Construction Court has prompted the industry to once again reflect on the well-documented cases of ISG v Seevic and Harding v Paice, from which the phrase “Smash & Grab” was born.

art
  • 06 November 2017
  • Employment

Will lawyers save the planet?

Very soon a Norwegian court will hear a case based on environmental concerns against the issue of oil exploration licences. The case is helpfully reported in The Economist (Nov 4-10th).

art
  • 27 October 2017
  • Employment

A much-needed win for vulnerable and exploited domestic workers

As we have previously blogged, UK law does not do enough to protect migrant domestic workers in the UK from abuse, exploitation and modern slavery.

art
  • 27 October 2017
  • Employment

Greek government falls short with discriminatory height requirement for police

The ECJ has held in Ypourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton v Kalliri that a minimum height requirement of 170cm imposed by the Greek Government for men and women wishing to join the police force, amounted to indirect sex discrimination and could not be objectively justified.

art
  • 27 October 2017
  • Employment

Government announces start of tribunal fees refund scheme

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling this summer that Employment Tribunal fees were unlawful, the government has announced its fees refund scheme: individuals will be refunded their original fee along with an interest of 0.5% calculated from the date of the original payment up until the refund date.

art
  • 13 October 2017
  • Employment

Mental Health Week 2017: tackling the stigma of mental health in the workplace

The 10th October marked World Mental Health Day and this year’s theme was ‘mental health in the workplace’.