Search

How can we help?

Business Employment

Unfair dismissal lawyers in London & Thames Valley

Dismissal situations can be difficult for all those involved. Our employment solicitors can offer clear and timely tailor-made advice to guide you through the process. Every employee who has been employed for at least 2 years “the qualifying period of service” has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. In some cases, employees with less than 2 years’ service are also protected.

If there is to be a dismissal, you as the employer must show that the principle reason, falls into one of the categories set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Unless you as the employer can prove one (or more) of the above fair reasons for dismissal, and that your process is fair, then you run the risk of your former employee bringing a claim in the Employment Tribunal, and the tribunal finding your termination to be unfair dismissal.

An exceptional balance of expertise and personality.”

Legal 500

FAQs- Unfair Dismissal

Employees with at least two years’ continuous service have the right not to be unfairly dismissed.  A dismissal will be unfair unless it has been made for one of five legally permitted reasons and the employer has acted reasonably in treating that reason as sufficient to justify dismissal.

The law also sets out a small number of cases where dismissals will be ‘automatically unfair’ for example where dismissals are connected to whistleblowing or asserting a statutory right.  In these cases, it just needs to be shown that the employer dismissed the employee for one of the automatically unfair reasons, there’s no need to consider the reasonableness of the employer’s actions.  This type of claim can be brought by any employee, even those with less than two years’ service.

This refers to a situation where an employee resigns due to the actions of the employer.  There must be a repudiatory breach on the part of the employer and the employee must show that they have resigned as a result of that breach.  The law then effectively converts the resignation into a dismissal for unfair dismissal purposes.

This refers to a situation where an employee is dismissed in breach of contract.  This type of claim often arises as a result of an employee being dismissed without the notice that they are entitled to under their employment contract.

These are:

  • Capability or Qualifications
  • Misconduct
  • Redundancy
  • Contravention of Statute
  • Some Other Substantial Reason

The Government does report on Tribunal statistics quarterly on its website which includes details of average awards.  However, average sums will not give an accurate picture of likely compensation as awards can differ substantially.

Where a Tribunal finds that an employee has been unfairly dismissed, it typically awards two types of compensation, a ‘basic award’ and a ‘compensatory award’.  There are statutory caps that apply to the compensation available for unfair dismissal claims.

The basic award is calculated in the same way as a statutory redundancy payment.  The compensation award is capped at a specific amount prescribed by law (adjusted each year) or  52 weeks’ gross pay if lower.

 

Key contacts

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 10 November 2017
  • Employment

The importance of understanding the economic entity in a TUPE situation

For there to be a business transfer under TUPE there must be an ‘economic entity’ that retains its identity post-transfer.

art
  • 10 November 2017
  • Brexit

Brexit Update: Government Publishes ‘Technical Document’ on EU citizens’ rights

Last night, Theresa May confirmed that the EU Withdrawal Bill would be amended to formally commit to Brexit at 23:00 GMT on 29 March 2019. This comes after the government published a ‘technical document’ on Tuesday setting out further details of how the new settled status scheme for EU nationals and their family members would operate as the UK leaves the EU. The document seeks to reassure the 3 million EU citizens currently living in the UK of their immigration status post-Brexit.

art
  • 06 November 2017
  • Employment

Will lawyers save the planet?

Very soon a Norwegian court will hear a case based on environmental concerns against the issue of oil exploration licences. The case is helpfully reported in The Economist (Nov 4-10th).

art
  • 27 October 2017
  • Employment

A much-needed win for vulnerable and exploited domestic workers

As we have previously blogged, UK law does not do enough to protect migrant domestic workers in the UK from abuse, exploitation and modern slavery.

art
  • 27 October 2017
  • Employment

Greek government falls short with discriminatory height requirement for police

The ECJ has held in Ypourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton v Kalliri that a minimum height requirement of 170cm imposed by the Greek Government for men and women wishing to join the police force, amounted to indirect sex discrimination and could not be objectively justified.

art
  • 27 October 2017
  • Employment

Government announces start of tribunal fees refund scheme

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling this summer that Employment Tribunal fees were unlawful, the government has announced its fees refund scheme: individuals will be refunded their original fee along with an interest of 0.5% calculated from the date of the original payment up until the refund date.

Clarkslegal’s innovative approach to solving complex cases is consistent; their quality standards are extremely high and their staff are efficient and friendly – overall 11/10!”

Carrol Douglas-Welsh, Head of Employee Relations – Scottish and Southern Energy