Search

How can we help?

Business Employment

Unfair dismissal lawyers in London & Thames Valley

Dismissal situations can be difficult for all those involved. Our employment solicitors can offer clear and timely tailor-made advice to guide you through the process. Every employee who has been employed for at least 2 years “the qualifying period of service” has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. In some cases, employees with less than 2 years’ service are also protected.

If there is to be a dismissal, you as the employer must show that the principle reason, falls into one of the categories set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Unless you as the employer can prove one (or more) of the above fair reasons for dismissal, and that your process is fair, then you run the risk of your former employee bringing a claim in the Employment Tribunal, and the tribunal finding your termination to be unfair dismissal.

An exceptional balance of expertise and personality.”

Legal 500

FAQs- Unfair Dismissal

Employees with at least two years’ continuous service have the right not to be unfairly dismissed.  A dismissal will be unfair unless it has been made for one of five legally permitted reasons and the employer has acted reasonably in treating that reason as sufficient to justify dismissal.

The law also sets out a small number of cases where dismissals will be ‘automatically unfair’ for example where dismissals are connected to whistleblowing or asserting a statutory right.  In these cases, it just needs to be shown that the employer dismissed the employee for one of the automatically unfair reasons, there’s no need to consider the reasonableness of the employer’s actions.  This type of claim can be brought by any employee, even those with less than two years’ service.

This refers to a situation where an employee resigns due to the actions of the employer.  There must be a repudiatory breach on the part of the employer and the employee must show that they have resigned as a result of that breach.  The law then effectively converts the resignation into a dismissal for unfair dismissal purposes.

This refers to a situation where an employee is dismissed in breach of contract.  This type of claim often arises as a result of an employee being dismissed without the notice that they are entitled to under their employment contract.

These are:

  • Capability or Qualifications
  • Misconduct
  • Redundancy
  • Contravention of Statute
  • Some Other Substantial Reason

The Government does report on Tribunal statistics quarterly on its website which includes details of average awards.  However, average sums will not give an accurate picture of likely compensation as awards can differ substantially.

Where a Tribunal finds that an employee has been unfairly dismissed, it typically awards two types of compensation, a ‘basic award’ and a ‘compensatory award’.  There are statutory caps that apply to the compensation available for unfair dismissal claims.

The basic award is calculated in the same way as a statutory redundancy payment.  The compensation award is capped at a specific amount prescribed by law (adjusted each year) or  52 weeks’ gross pay if lower.

 

Key contacts

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 30 October 2019
  • Employment

Covert recording of employees: No breach of human rights

In López Ribalda and others v Spain, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has held that it was not a breach of Article 6 (right to a fair trial) or Article 8 (right to respect for a private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, to covertly record employees as part of an investigation into suspected theft and for the recording to be used at trial.

art
  • 24 October 2019
  • Employment

Using preferred pronouns for transgender individuals

In the case of Mackereth v The Department for Work and Pensions and another, the Claimant was a doctor who refused to use transgender individuals’ preferred pronouns and titles as he claimed it went against his Christian beliefs.

art
  • 18 October 2019
  • Employment

Confidentiality agreements guidance

NDAs have long been a popular subject in the media. Seeking to clarify its position on their use in employment matters, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued new guidance. The purpose of the guidance is to clarify the law on confidentiality agreements in employment scenarios, with particular emphasis on improving understanding and transparency when combating discrimination in the workplace.

art
  • 11 October 2019
  • Employment

Little white lies: not giving the true reasons for dismissal pointed to discrimination

This week, in Base Childrenswear v Otshudi, the Court of Appeal confirmed that not being honest about the reason for dismissal can show that the employer has a discrimination case to answer.

art
  • 11 October 2019
  • Employment

Striking a Balance – Activism and the Workplace

In the wake of September’s Global Climate Strike, protests previously confined to the personal sphere are now spilling over onto the streets and taking place during the working day.This article considers the legal position of employees who participate in this kind of activism, with a view to helping organisations take a considered approach to their response.

art
  • 11 October 2019
  • Employment

IR35: control comes at a £920,000 cost

As the April 2020 IR35 changes loom ever larger, there is a lot of attention on challenges under the current system to the tax arrangements of consultants providing work through their own personal service companies.

Clarkslegal’s innovative approach to solving complex cases is consistent; their quality standards are extremely high and their staff are efficient and friendly – overall 11/10!”

Carrol Douglas-Welsh, Head of Employee Relations – Scottish and Southern Energy