Search

How can we help?

Business Employment

TUPE

 

From sales or purchase of a company to a change in cleaning contractor or IT services provider, our experienced employment lawyers can advise on the effect of Transfer of Undertakings (TUPE) and what it could mean for your business. 

The purpose of TUPE is to protect employees if their employer changes hands. The effect of TUPE is to automatically transfer the employees, along with all rights and any liabilities associated with them, from the old employer to the new employer. 

TUPE can apply to employers of all sizes from the sole trader employing one part-time member of staff to multinational corporations. It covers an enormous number of different business transactions and, if it isn’t followed correctly, you could be left with significant liabilities and penalties. 

We offer clear, practical and jargon free support so that you can get to grips with TUPE and manage the process and expectations of those affected. 

TUPE Podcast Series

TUPE can be a very complicated area of law to navigate and so we have designed a series of short podcasts to give you a really good overview of the basics.

1. When Does TUPE Apply? – Relevant Transfers

2. Service Provision Changes – Same Client and Fundamentally the Same Activities

3. TUPE Podcast Series: Service Provision Changes – Organised grouping and principal purpose

4. TUPE Podcast Series: Service Provision Changes – Single specific events or tasks of short duration

5. TUPE Podcast Series: Who Transfers?

An exceptional balance of expertise and personality.”

Legal 500

FAQs – TUPE

TUPE stands for the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 which aim to protect employees when the business in which they work changes hands or there is a change of service provider.

If TUPE applies, the transferee (i.e. the new incoming business owner or service provider) takes on some of the rights and liabilities associated with the employees who were employed by the transferor (i.e. the old business owner or service provider).

The contracts of employment for employees employed by the transferor (i.e. the old business owner or service provider) and assigned to the ‘organised grouping of resources or employees that is subject to the relevant transfer’ will transfer automatically to the transferee (i.e. the new business owner or service provider) and continue unchanged, with the exception of some old age, invalidity and survivor benefits under occupational pension schemes.

Yes.  Transferors are obliged to provide certain information (known as Employee Liability Information) about the transferring employees to the transferee at least 28 days before the transfer takes place.  This includes the identity and age of the employees and certain information relating to the employees’ employment terms, disciplinaries, grievances, claims and collective agreements.

For TUPE to apply, there must be a change of employer.  A genuine transfer of shares involves a change in the ownership of share capital only, not a change of employer, so TUPE would not apply.  However, there may be TUPE transfers surrounding the share sale, for example if assets are moved around in preparation for the share sale or if after the transfer another company (such as a parent company) takes over the day to day running of the company.

Transferors are required to provide certain information to ‘appropriate representatives’ of their affected employees.  If there are no representatives and, after being given an opportunity to elect representatives following a reasonable timeframe they fail to do so, the information must be provided to the affected employees themselves.

This information includes:

  • The fact that a transfer is to take place, the date or proposed date of the transfer and the reasons for it;
  • The legal, economic and social implications of the transfer for any affected employees;
  • The measures, which it envisages it will, in connection with the transfer, take in relation to any of its affected employees (if no measures are envisaged it should state that);
  • The measures, in connection with the transfer, that it envisages the other party will take in relation to its affected employees (if no measures are envisaged it should state that); and
  • Suitable information relating to the use of agency workers e.g. the number of agency workers working for it, the parts of the business where they work and the type of work being carried out.

Transferors are also required to provide certain information (known as ‘Employee Liability Information’) to the transferee at least 28 days prior to the transfer.  This includes the identity and age of the employees and certain information relating to the employees’ employment terms, disciplinaries, grievances, claims and collective agreements.

No, not on TUPE alone. TUPE operates to preserve employees’ existing terms and conditions, not to enhance them.   There may be circumstances where employees are able to rely on TUPE in conjunction with something else, like equal pay legislation, to request enhanced terms but this will be dependent on the circumstances in each case.

The transferor must provide certain information about the transfer to the appropriate representatives “long enough before the relevant transfer to enable the employer of any affected employees to consult the appropriate representatives of any affected employees”.

Key contacts

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 22 November 2019
  • Employment

Global labour standards will have a bigger impact on the UK, whatever the outcome of the election

the Labour Party has set out a radical manifesto for the future of UK employment law and there has been a lot of focus on the changes to laws affecting trade unions. It is worth picking up on further comments by the shadow chancellor today. When he was put on the spot regarding Labour’s position on secondary picketing, he refused to be pinned down but did state: “We will make sure that people have the right, as in the ILO conventions to withdraw their labour.”

art
  • 22 November 2019
  • Employment

Unfair dismissal due to trade union activities

In the recent case of Cadent Gas Ltd v Singh the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal decision that an employee was automatically unfairly dismissed because of his trade union activities despite the fact that the disciplinary and appeal officers were not motivated by his union activities.

art
  • 15 November 2019
  • Employment

Changing reasonable adjustments could be discriminatory

Employers should be aware that changing or removing adjustments for a disabled employee could amount to a failure to make reasonable adjustments, even if they are replaced with other adjustments.

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

Restrictive Covenants – What’s happened in 2019

There have been some cases in 2019 which have offered employers guidance on restrictive covenants and demonstrated how important it is for employers to review such restrictions carefully.

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

How employers should manage workplace romances

It is reported that over 50% of people have engaged in a workplace romance at some time in their career. Following the rise of the #MeToo movement it is fundamental that employers are aware of how to manage romantic relationships between colleagues and that training is provided to ensure compliance with workplace policies.The Chief Executive (“CE”) of McDonalds has this week been fired following a romantic relationship with a fellow employee. Despite the fact that the fast food giant acknowledged that the relationship was consensual, the CE was dismissed as he had violated company policy by engaging in the…

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

Capita not liable to compensate for employee’s racist comments

Employers can be held legally responsible (vicariously liable) for the discriminatory actions of their employees which have taken place in the course of employment. To avoid being held liable, an employer would have to show that it took all reasonable steps to prevent the discriminatory actions from occurring. This is exactly what Capita managed to do in a recent racial harassment case, brought against both Capita and one of Capita’s operations managers.

Clarkslegal’s innovative approach to solving complex cases is consistent; their quality standards are extremely high and their staff are efficient and friendly – overall 11/10!”

Carrol Douglas-Welsh, Head of Employee Relations – Scottish and Southern Energy